|
|
|
|
Site Number: |
Z4U4 |
|
Contract Number: |
|
|
D.O. Number: |
|
|
Action Memo Date: |
|
|
Response Authority: |
OPA |
|
Response Type: |
Emergency |
|
Response Lead: |
EPA |
|
Incident Category: |
Removal Action |
|
NPL Status: |
Non NPL |
|
Operable Unit: |
|
|
Mobilization Date: |
5/11/2011 |
|
Start Date: |
5/11/2011 |
|
Demob Date: |
6/11/2011 |
|
Completion Date: |
6/11/2011 |
|
CERCLIS ID: |
|
|
RCRIS ID: |
|
|
ERNS No.: |
|
|
State Notification: |
|
|
FPN#: |
E11413 |
|
Reimbursable Account #: |
Z4U4 |
1.1.1 Incident Category
Emergency Response - Oil Release (OPA). Funding to contain the release was obtained from NPFC under the OSC's warrant authority.
1.1.2 Site Description
Farmland containing at least eight abandoned oil wells along Smith Bridge Road, west of Easton, Ohio County, Kentucky.
1.1.2.1 Location
This abandoned oil well was identified as Preston Mathews Lease #D by Kentucky Oil and Gas Greg Welch. This well was approx 150 yards from Smith Bridge Road.
1.1.2.2 Description of Threat
On Wednesday evening, May 11th, Kentucky Oil and Gas' Greg Welch
informed the OSC of an actively leaking abandoned oil well along Smith
Bridge Road two miles west of Easton, Kentucky. Upon inspection, the OSC
found that approximately 2-5 barrels of crude oil had impacted a small
marsh area immediately downgradient from the well but the crude had not
entered a drainage ditch along Smith Bridge Road. The abandoned well is
located approximately 150 yards from the South Fork of Panther Creek in
Hancock County. Funding from NPFC was obtained and ERRs contractors were
on site to contain the spill.
1.1.3 Preliminary Removal Assessment/Removal Site Inspection Results
|
|
|
|
2.1.1 Narrative
On Thursday, May 12th, ERRs (WRS Inc.) mobed a mini-excavator to the well location and dug a retention pit around the well to contain the spill. The well was actively leaking approx 2-5 barrels of oil per day along with natural gas. The OSC tasked ERRs to plug this abandoned well when appropriate during the ongoing Easton Area D well plugging operations approx two miles to the east of this location.
2.1.2 Response Actions to Date
On Thursday, June 2, ERRs
relocated the subcontractors (Barnett and Smith) oil well service rig from the
Easton Area D location to this well. The well was opened and 65 feet of two
inch production tubing was pulled from the eight inch surface casing. Next the
ERRs crew introduced 70 feet of two inch tubing with a swedge onto the surface
casing and then introduced 198 feet of one inch tubing inside the two inch in
order to begin well wash down. The crew began washing down the well removing
residual oil, debris and scale and noted a substantial amount of natural gas
coming from the well once bottom was reached.
Throughout Friday, June 3rd, subcontractors
and ERRs continued the well wash down again noting a significant amount of
natural gas off-gassing. ERRs continued monitoring air levels during these
operations for worker protection. The decision was made to simply let the well
off-gas throughout the weekend and conduct cementing on Monday. ERRs began
preparing for cementing operations for Monday, June 6.
On Monday, June 6th, Barnett and Smith with the ERRs crew began
mixing cement (100 sacks), 2 bags of calcium chloride and pumping mixture
through the pump truck into the inserted 1” tubing to the bottom of the well
casing and circulated to ground surface.
After the well had been plugged the crews worked on cleaning all pumping
equipment and began working on relocating all drilling and pumping equipment
back to the Easton Area D project site.
On Tuesday, June 7th, the ERRs crew began working on
restoring the area around the well. Using the mini-excavator the crew excavated the well casing to a
depth of approximately 5’ and the well casing was cut off. The
crew then backfilled and graded the work area surrounding the well including the well borehole.
The ERRs crew continued working on
restoring the entire work area and all oil impacted areas on the property
surrounding the well. A burial pit was
excavated and any and all areas (soil & vegetation) impacted with oil was
scraped and placed in the bottom of the pit with lime and straw to enhance biodegradation and the pit was backfilled. The entire disturbed area was graded out to
allow rain to flow without pooling. The project site was closed and secured.
2.1.3 Enforcement Activities, Identity of Potentially Responsible Parties (PRPs)
2.1.4 Progress Metrics
| Waste Stream |
Medium |
Quantity |
Manifest # |
Treatment |
Disposal |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|