United States Environmental Protection Agency
Region X
POLLUTION REPORT



Date:
Monday, November 21, 2005
From:
Michael Szerlog

To:
NPFC Polreps, USCG (POLREP List)
Anthony Barber, EPA Region 10 (POLREP List)
Dan Opalski, EPA Region 10 (POLREP List)
Eugene Lee, EPA HQ (POLREP List)
Chris Field, Region 10 List - EPA Region 10
Steve Heaton, IDEQ - LUST Program
Wally Moon, EPA - UST Program
Miguel Bella, USCG
James Werntz, EPA

Subject: 

Final POLREP
Ashton Texaco Oil Release
363 Highway 20, Ashton, ID
Latitude: 44.0750000
Longitude: -111.4600000


POLREP No.:
26
Site #:
Z0A3
Reporting Period:
8/1/05 - 11/21/05
D.O. #:
64-10-17
Start Date:
2/14/2005
Response Authority:
OPA
Mob Date:
2/14/2005
Response Type:
Demob Date:
2/24/2005
NPL Status:
Non NPL
Completion Date:
 
Incident Category:
Removal Action
CERCLIS ID #:
Contract #
RCRIS ID #:
IDR000201400
Reimbursable Account #
Z0A3
FPN#
E03012
 

Site Description

See polrep number 1.


Current Activities

On September 1, 2005, EPA notified IDEQ that the OSLTF funding for the site was nearing the ceiling and EPA was not able to secure additional funding due to the lack of a continued threat of a release to surface water (this decision was based upon months without collecting any more oil).  EPA presented IDEQ with the following four options for the site:  (1) EPA completely removes the treatment system  then demobilizes from the site; (2)EPA removes only the carbon system and ground water pump then demobilizes from the site; (3) EPA removes only the carbon system and then demobilizes from the site; (4) EPA operates entire system for one month as is and IDEQ assumes complete control of the site and all costs associated with the treatment system.  

On September 6, 2005, IDEQ indicated it would like EPA to remove all of the equipment that was used in the groundwater suppression system, and leave the passive free product skimmers, control panel and tank (all the equipment IDEQ currently owns).  In addition, the requested that EPA coordinate with them and the local Power vendor so that IDEQ could be left set up functioning with the original free product recovery system operational.  

On October 1, 2005, USCG NPFC agreed to provide EPA with an additional $20,000 to cover demobilization costs associated with the Demobilization Plan. The USCG increased the FPN ceiling from $590,000 to $610,000.

On October 4 and 5, 2005, the EPA ERRS contractor mobilized to the site to carry out the Ashton Texaco Demobilization Plan.  The EPA ERRS contractor disconnected electricity from the groundwater treatment system and removed all of the leased equipment including the groundwater depression pumps, control boxes, and water treatment system.  The EPA ERRS contractor shipped all of the leased equipment back to the appropriae vendors.  The EPA ERRS contractor disassembled the treatment system shed and removed any aboveground piping.  The City of Ashton completed the capping of the connection to the sanitary sewer system.  The EPA ERRS re-installed the product pumps and reprogrammed the control boxes.  This system was purchased by IDEQ and will be maintained by the State.  

November 21, 2005, the EPA ERRS Contractor's subcontractor finished the additional work on the site.  No additional site work is anticipated.


Planned Removal Actions

None. The State-owned product pumps and aboveground storage tank will remain on site and will be managed by IDEQ.


Next Steps

EPA will finish the documentation on the case.


Key Issues

Site being managed by IDEQ.


Estimated Costs *
  Budgeted Total To Date Remaining % Remaining
Extramural Costs
ERRS - Cleanup Contractor $375,000.00 $348,739.00 $26,261.00 7.00%
RST/START $140,000.00 $134,106.00 $5,894.00 4.21%
PRFA - IDEQ $20,000.00 $19,435.00 $565.00 2.83%
Intramural Costs
USEPA - Direct (Region, HQ) $40,000.00 $34,080.00 $5,920.00 14.80%
USEPA - InDirect $35,000.00 $29,061.00 $5,939.00 16.97%
 
Total Site Costs $610,000.00 $565,421.00 $44,579.00 7.31%

* The above accounting of expenditures is an estimate based on figures known to the OSC at the time this report was written. The OSC does not necessarily receive specific figures on final payments made to any contractor(s). Other financial data which the OSC must rely upon may not be entirely up-to-date. The cost accounting provided in this report does not necessarily represent an exact monetary figure which the government may include in any claim for cost recovery.


response.epa.gov/AshtonTexaco

POLREP #26 Last Updated 11/21/2005