United States Environmental Protection Agency
Region I
POLLUTION REPORT



Date:
Monday, August 21, 2006
From:
Allen Jarrell


Subject: 

Initiation of Action
Jard Company Site
126 Bowen Rd, Bennington, VT
Latitude: 42.8906000
Longitude: -73.1894000


POLREP No.:
1
Site #:
01L2
Reporting Period:
08/01/2006 - 08/18/2006
D.O. #:
0055
Start Date:
8/17/2006
Response Authority:
CERCLA
Mob Date:
8/17/2006
Response Type:
Time-Critical
Demob Date:
 
NPL Status:
Non NPL
Completion Date:
 
Incident Category:
Removal Action
CERCLIS ID #:
VTD04814741
Contract #
68-W-03-037
RCRIS ID #:
 

Site Description

The Site encompasses approximately 36.16 acres and includes a 120,000 square foot vacant building; paved parking areas, grassed areas and lightly wooded areas within a unsecured security fence and in front of the building; and a larger undeveloped wooded area outside of the unsecured security fence extending south to the Roaring Branch of the Walloomsac River (Roaring Branch) and west to adjacent properties. The Site’s current local zoning classification is Industrial.

Hazardous substances include PCBs and asbestos.  High levels of PCBs are located in the soil outside and beneath the building, in the concrete slab of portions of the building, and on the steels walls of the building.  Asbestos was identified in floor tiles in the building.  VT DEC also noted elevated levels of DEHP, VOCs, and Zinc in their Brownsfield report.


Current Activities

EPA OSC and SHAW RM conducted site walk on 8/17/2006. The scope of work steps were discussed and approved.  SHAW DBA and EPA OSRR RCRA cap designer also participated in the site walk.  Discussed getting the town to detached power lines from the building and approve using the fire hydrant on site for water.


Planned Removal Actions

1)       Complete tree cutting of the entire facility exterior footprint, the 120,000 square foot facility is not visible from all sides of the property.
2)       Notify DIGSAFE and have utilities marked out.
3)       Mobilization of all support zone equipment and materials and establish electrical and phone utilities.
4)       Mobilization and set up of approximately 700 feet of temporary security fence and 2 sets of gates.
5)       Removal and disposal of all asbestos containing floor tile located in the facility front office.  
6)       Remove three (3) separate sets of power lines and wires leading from a set of four transformers and another set of three transformers, all still attached to electric panels within the facility.
7)       Remove 1-above ground storage tank, 1- below ground storage tank, 1 bag house structure, and 2-Transformers currently on concrete slab.
8)       Demolition, segregation and disposal of the 120,000 square foot facility.
9)       Demolition and disposal of the former drum storage containment area.
10)   Removal and disposal of the former facility concrete slab contaminated with PCB’S. Excavation and disposal of PCB contaminated soils from under slab floor up to a possible depth of six (6 “+) feet.
11)   Removal of the dry well located at the far north end of the former facility. Complete any miscellaneous soil excavation from around the former facility foot print and disposal of material.
12)   Install an Earth cap across the entire former facility foot print and seed.
13)   Decontamination of equipment and demobilization of all support zone areas.


Next Steps

Direct and coordinate with START and ERRS the ongoing removal action.  In addition, coordinate efforts with VT DEC and the Town of Bennington, VT.


Estimated Costs *
  Budgeted Total To Date Remaining % Remaining
Extramural Costs
ERRS - Cleanup Contractor $1,833,200.00 $8,000.00 $1,825,200.00 99.56%
RST/START $166,000.00 $0.00 $166,000.00 100.00%
Intramural Costs
 
Total Site Costs $1,999,200.00 $8,000.00 $1,991,200.00 99.60%

* The above accounting of expenditures is an estimate based on figures known to the OSC at the time this report was written. The OSC does not necessarily receive specific figures on final payments made to any contractor(s). Other financial data which the OSC must rely upon may not be entirely up-to-date. The cost accounting provided in this report does not necessarily represent an exact monetary figure which the government may include in any claim for cost recovery.


response.epa.gov/JardCompany

POLREP #1 Last Updated 6/12/2007