On February 27, 2008, ENSR performed low-flow groundwater sampling at monitoring wells MW-5, MW-6, MW-7, and MW-8 at the Site. All groundwater samples were collected and analyzed for total and dissolved arsenic, chromium and copper via EPA Method 6020. Figure 1 provides the location of the monitoring wells. All monitoring wells were purged in accordance with the EPA Low-Flow Purging and Sampling of Groundwater Monitoring Wells methodologies (October 15, 1997) using a Grundfos submersible pump and dedicated polyethylene tubing. A Horiba U-22 was utilized to measure field groundwater quality parameters, including temperature, pH, specific conductivity, dissolved oxygen (DO), oxidationreduction potential (ORP), and turbidity. Groundwater was purged at approximately 200 milliliters per minute (mL/min) and groundwater quality readings were collected every five minutes until all the groundwater quality parameters were stabilized.
Upon stabilization, groundwater samples were collected directly from the polyethylene tubing and placed into laboratory-provided bottleware. Sample bottles were placed into a cooler containing ice and transported via FedEx to TestAmerica Laboratories located in Pittsburgh,Pennsylvania. Field Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) samples (field duplicate and field blank samples) were also collected on February 27, 2008. Two field blank samples designated as FB0022708 (total metals) and FB022708 (dissolved metals) were collected by pouring laboratory-supplied deionized water through factory-clean, polyethylene tubing, and a decontaminated Grundfos pump into laboratory provided bottleware. Two duplicate samples were also collected from MW-5 and were designated as MW-5 DIS DUP (dissolved metals) and MW-5 TOTAL DUP (total metals). Results of the groundwater sampling are expected by March 21, 2008 and will be discussed in the March 2008 progress report.
On February 27, 2008 ENSR also inspected the erosion and sediment controls and site security. The erosion and sediment controls remained in place and effective and the site access gate was secure.
|