United States Environmental Protection Agency
Region II
POLLUTION REPORT



Date:
Tuesday, November 4, 2008
From:
Paul L. Kahn, Michael Hoppe

To:
Paul Kahn, ERRD-RPB
Tim Grier, USEPA Headquarters 5202G
Patricia Carr, USEPA-PAD
Mary Mears, USEPA, Region 2, PAD
Ellen Banner, USEPA
John LaPadula, USEPA
Carole Petersen, USEPA
Jim Daloia, USEPA
Eric Mosher, USEPA
John Higgins, USEPA
Gregory Deangelis, USEPA Region 2
Andrew Raddant, Department of Interior
Deborah Schwenk, USEPA
Lisa Levy, OSHA
Michael Hoppe, USEPA
Kevin McCarthy, Clifton Fire Department
William Molnar, Sandy Alexander
Albert Greco, City of Clifton
Tara Donn, USEPA Region 02 CID
Leah Escobar, ATSDR
Denise Zeno, USEPA
Angela Carpenter, USEPA
Melissa Dimas, USEPA

Subject: 

SPECIAL #2
Abrachem Chemical
2 Peekay Drive, Clifton, NJ
Latitude: 40.8306000
Longitude: -74.1231000


POLREP No.:
4
Site #:
Reporting Period:
D.O. #:
Start Date:
 
Response Authority:
CERCLA
Mob Date:
 
Response Type:
Time-Critical
Demob Date:
 
NPL Status:
Non NPL
Completion Date:
 
Incident Category:
Removal Action
CERCLIS ID #:
Contract #
RCRIS ID #:
 

Site Description

At 1615 hours on 10/29/08 EPA received a phone notification from the NRC that a chemical release was occurring at Abrachem Chemical, a bulk chemical packaging facility that leases property in Clifton, Passaic County, NJ.  The NJ Dept. of Environmental Protection requested EPA presence at the scene.

At 1730 hours OSC Ellen Banner and OSC Paul Kahn responded to the scene.  The company was found to be storing drums and bulk storage containers of known and unknown chemicals in 17 56-foot long intermodal shipping carriers, stacked 3 tiers high (approx. 35 feet).  Only 5 of the intermodals could be opened, and inside those it was observed that drums and bulk containers were staged behind tiers of new, blue poly drums which gave the impression that the intermodals were used only for new drum storage.  

The owner of Abrachem retained the services of a remediation company which was on the scene, but waiting for EPA to arrived prior to starting work.  Contractor personnel were advised to lay poly sheeting and begin removing/overpacking the leaking and unknown drums that were readily accessible.  Work commenced almost immediately, but at 2100 hours work was halted due to lack of adequate lighting and the physical inability to access the majority of the drums.  Work will resume on 10/30/08 when additional personnel and equipment arrive on-Site.

A meeting was held with the owner, EPA, state, and local authorities at 1000 hours on 10/30/08.
At that time a Field Expedient Notice was issued to Mr. Ted Frey, the owner/operator of Abrachem Chemical.


Current Activities

On 11/4/2008 OSCs Banner and Kahn met with the RP, his Plant Manager, and environmental consultant at the Site.  In response to the Field Expedient Notice given to the RP at our previous meeting on 10/30/2008, the RP has stated in writing that he will undertake a response action with respect to the chemicals inside the 17 intermodal shipping containers at the Site.


Planned Removal Actions

The RP's contractor, GTI, has indicated that a contract will be awarded this week for a subcontractor who will do the actual clean-up work.  Activities may start as soon as Friday, November 6th.  

GTI provided EPA with a draft outline of a work plan.  EPA will review and provide comments on this work plan to GTI.  The timeframe for the completion of the removal action calls for 50% of the chemicals in the intermodals to be addressed by 11/15/2008, and the remainder not later than 12/31/2008.


Next Steps

EPA will allow the RP-lead removal action to go forward until such time as the response is complete or EPA determines that the RP is unable or unwilling to complete the work.  At such time EPA will Federalize the Site and assume jurisdiction over the response action.

EPA will maintain daily contact with the RP's contractor and will have an on-Site presence on a daily basis, either by EPA OSCs or trained EPA contractor personnel.


Key Issues

Finalizing draft work plan and initiating daily monitoring of contractor and subcontractor activities.


Estimated Costs *
  Budgeted Total To Date Remaining % Remaining
Extramural Costs
Intramural Costs
 
Total Site Costs $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00%

* The above accounting of expenditures is an estimate based on figures known to the OSC at the time this report was written. The OSC does not necessarily receive specific figures on final payments made to any contractor(s). Other financial data which the OSC must rely upon may not be entirely up-to-date. The cost accounting provided in this report does not necessarily represent an exact monetary figure which the government may include in any claim for cost recovery.


response.epa.gov/abrachemchemical

POLREP #4 Last Updated 11/4/2008