U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

HTTPS

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock () or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Brenau University Mercury Spill

All POLREP's for this site Brenau University Mercury Spill
Gainesville, GA - EPA Region IV
POLREP #2 - Interim Action
Printer Friendly  |   PDF
 
On-Scene Coordinator - Rick Jardine 8/18/2009
Emergency - Removal Action Pollution Report (POLREP) #2
Start Date: 8/14/2009
Pollution Report (POLREP) #2
Site Description
On or about Monday August 10th, the removal of a mercury-containing device along with worthless debris from a science lab at Brenau University (Brenau) resulted in a release of mercury to the floor and along the route to the garbage pen at the NW corner of the building.  EQ conducted the initial stabilization of much of the visible mercury.

During the morning of Monday August 17, 2009, John Keller of Brenau contacted OSC Jardine requesting that EPA conduct the appropriate removal action at the Science Building at 615 Washington Street.  Mr. Keller identified timeliness and availability of resources as essential to the response since classes are scheduled to begin Monday August 24th.  


Current Activities
OSC Jardine mobilized ERRS contractor ER and START consultant TTEMI to the site to begin the emergency removal action.  

Initial actions were to begin venting the contaminated areas, i.e. west stairwell, 2nd story corridor, lab room 22 and closet.  Heat from a torpedo heater was also applied to the west stairwell to supplement venting.  

The venting process provided an engineering control to enhance the safety of the workers plus those few college staff and administrators who needed limited access to the building during the day.  EPA vented the lab, closet, and corridors in addition to many rooms that were not directly affected by the spill.  Early in this spill history, internal HVAC systems migrated mercury vapors throughout the building.  The venting removed ambient mercury vapors that previously had been stagnant and were potentially adhering to the porous materials throughout the building.  

During the venting operation, ERRS removed small porous items such as cardboard and styrafoam display boards from the room.  These items were bagged and heated outdoors for assessment.  

After preparing the room, ER conducted a methodical mercury vacuum treatment of every accessible square inch of floor space within the lab and closet.  ER observed numerous mercury beads during this process.  Air screening indicated that additional mercury had likely become entrapped in the spaces between tiles and under some tiles that had puckered.  Free mercury was also determined to be beneath the vinyl base molding.  Both suspect tile and vinyl base were removed and the floor beneath merc vacuumed.  All intrusive activity was conducted in Level C personal protective equipment.

ERRS set up the lab, corridor, and both stairwells for an active cool venting for the entire night.



Planned Removal Actions
On Tuesday EPA plans to screen the entire building to determine relative gains, remove any additional materials as necessary, continue with heat and vent tactics and begin chemical washing of mercury contact surfaces.

Key Issues
During the workday the professor who caused the release while cleaning up the lab closet, came by the building to retrieve some medicine from his office.  OSC Jardine interviewed him and determined that the path from room 22 to the garbage pen was as EPA theorized (leave lab turn left down the hall and descend the west stairwell.  START screened his car to determine whether any residual mercury was remaining.  The levels were below EPA R4 removal action levels.  

Also the professor stated that his normal workload placed him in the lab 4 times per week - two labs and two classroom sessions.  He will have two such classes.  Therefore, he expects to be in room 22 for approximately twelve hours each week and his students should be in room 22 six hours per week.