1.1.1          Incident Category

CERCLA Incident Category:  Inactive Metal Fabrication/Finishing/Coating Facility

1.1.2 Site Description

1.1.2.1 Location

The Indiana Brass Site is located at 800 W. Clinton Street in Frankfort, Clinton County, Indiana, 46041.  The geographical coordinates for the Site are Latitude 40.2806° North and Longitude 86.5198° West.  The Site is approximately 5 acres in size, and contains the remains of a 85,000 square foot plating shop and foundry.  The Site is located in a residential and industrial area of Frankfort, approximately 0.2 miles west of the downtown area.  Approximately 3400 people live within 1 mile of the Site.  Residences are located approximately 250 feet from the east property boundary, 800 feet from the north property boundary, and 600 feet from the south property boundary.

1.1.2.2 Description of Threat

The Site is a former foundry and plating shop that caught fire on June 3, 2010.  The Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM) responded to the fire.  The state On-Scene Coordinator (OSC) observed pits and drums relating to former plating operations.  IDEM referred the Site to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA).

During a Site visit on July 1, 2010 and a Site Assessment on July 7-8, 2010, the U.S. EPA documented numerous drums, plating vaults with unknown liquid contents, uncontained foundry sand, and other debris scattered across the Site. Numerous 55-gallon drums containing burnt and unknown contents were documented inside the building.  The Site was vacant and open to trespassing.

1.1.3 Preliminary Removal Assessment/Removal Site Inspection Results

The Site Assessment included documenting Site conditions; conducting a structural inspection of the building; conducting air monitoring; conducting soil monitoring using an x-ray fluorescence (XRF) detector; and collecting samples from drums, soil, ash, and plating pits.

Laboratory results indicated that the there are total metals`concentrations above the preliminary remediation goals (PRG) for industrial soil for lead, arsenic, and copper.  Concentrations of leachable lead (D008) and cadmium (D006) were above the Toxicity Characteristic Leachate Procedure (TCLP) regulatory limits.  Methylene chloride and trichloroethene (TCE) were detected in the pits, and methylene chloride was also detected in two drums.  Additionally, chrysotile asbestos was detected in 5 of the 9 samples collected.

During the next reporting period, U.S. EPA will conduct removal actions to complete the following tasks:

• Continue demolition and dust suppression activities;
• Continue air sampling and monitoring;
• Sample additional waste streams for disposal;
• Continue to assess nearby residential properties for site-related contamination.

2.2.1.2 Next Steps

EPA will continue time-critical removal activities to include:

• Demolishing and/or removing structurally unsound parts of the Site building to allow workers to conduct cleanup operations safely;
• Inventorying and performing hazard characterization on substances contained in vaults and drums;
• Performing multi-media sampling and analysis to determine disposal options; 
• Transporting and disposing off-site any hazardous substances, pollutants and contaminants at a CERCLA-approved disposal facility in accordance with U.S. EPA’s Off-Site Rule (40 CFR § 300.440); and, 
• Taking any other response actions to address any release or threatened release of a hazardous substance, pollutant or contaminant that the EPA OSC determines may pose an imminent and substantial endangerment to the public health or the environment.

2.2.2 Issues
The following are site-related issues:

• The Site was shut down for 3 weeks while personnel responded to the Enbridge Oil Spill; and
• EPA discovered a previously unknown vault (8'x8'x12') under the cyclone.  The vault contained approximately 2 feet of sludge.  EPA will sample the sludge to determine disposal options.

The Emergency and Rapid Response Services (ERRS) contractor will provide logistical support.

* The above accounting of expenditures is an estimate based on figures known to the OSC at the time this report was written. The OSC does not necessarily receive specific figures on final payments made to any contractor(s). Other financial data which the OSC must rely upon may not be entirely up-to-date. The cost accounting provided in this report does not necessarily represent an exact monetary figure which the government may include in any claim for cost recovery.