2.1.1 Narrative
ERRS completed clearing debris and staging and overpacking drums from the west building on 5/24/2016. START continued cataloging and sampling containers in the west building as they were removed from being stacked. Mercury vapor levels in the west building were found to be consistently below 5,000 ng/m3 and ERRS began returning staged drums to the previously mercury-contaminated side of the west building on 5/24.
Totes which had been stacked outside the south side of the west building were sampled. Several totes with quantities of liquid were extracted and staged at ground level. Totes with liquid in this area are mostly cracked or otherwise damaged and their liquid will have to be transferred to a different container prior to staging in the west building.
The vacuum tanker truck returned on 5/24 to remove liquids and sludge from the secondary containment area. Additional piping was cut to allow sludge to flow into the central sump. Sludge that had been shoveled onto the sloped driveway was also vacuumed into the tanker. Wastewater found in Tank #4 was transferred to the tanker by opening the manway in the side of the tank; less than 6 inches of sludge was left in the tank and it was resealed. Wastewater found in Tank #2 was transferred to the tanker first by opening a 3" valve and transferring through the central sump, then by opening the manway in the side of the tank; less than 10 inches of sludge was left in Tank #2 and it was resealed.
The sludge and water was transferred to totes which were staged in the north building after being filled. Decontamination of the tank farm was initiated with a general purpose degreasing cleaner and a pressure washer. The tanker continued to remove liquids as cleaning progressed in order to improve sludge removal from the tank. By the end of the day, less than 1000 gallons of sludge remained in the tank which would have to be removed on-site with the addition or water or would have to be cleaned at the transportation facility on Mobile, AL. The tanker was allowed to sit overnight at the Site by parking the rear of the tanker on the sloped parking area (the rear of the tanker contained the only outlet and would discharge into the secondary containment if leaking or open).
Hazard categorization progressed throughout the day and processed approximately 50 samples which matches the 50 samples from the previous two days.
2.1.2 Response Actions to Date
- Cleared debris from north building
- Began cleaning sumps in north building
- Began staging drums in north building
- Delineated extent of spilled mercury contamination
- Continued cataloging containers
- Continued sampling containers for hazard categorization
- Cleared debris from west building
- Began staging drums in west building
- Removed wastewater from secondary containment area
- Completed mercury removal
- Completed decontaminating mercury-contaminated area
- Completed removal and decontamination of mercury-contaminated drums
- Began hazard categorization
- Completed sludge removal from secondary containment area
- Began removing piping from tank farm
2.1.2.1 Current Container Count
Location |
Count (=>5 gal) |
Complete? |
North Building |
66 |
Yes |
West Building |
260 |
No |
Tank Farm |
17 |
No |
Outside |
139 |
Yes |
Size |
Count |
Drums (20-75 gal) |
314 |
Totes (220-500 gal) |
116 |
Buckets (5 gal) |
50 |
2.1.3 Enforcement Activities, Identity of Potentially Responsible Parties (PRPs)
The former partner declared that there were no available funds associated with the business to conduct the response and there were no other fund sources to undertake the action. Written access to conduct the response was not granted until May 18.
2.1.4 Progress Metrics
Waste Stream |
Medium |
Quantity |
Manifest # |
Treatment |
Disposal |
Petroleum Contact Water |
Secondary Containment Area |
5025 gal
|
1605647-01
|
Liquid Environmental Solutions |
|
Petroleum Contact Water |
Secondary Containment Area |
4735 gal |
1605647-02 |
Liquid Environmental Solutions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|