U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
POLLUTION/SITUATION REPORT
Keizer Mercury Spill - Removal Polrep
Initial Removal Polrep
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region X
|
Subject:
|
POLREP #1
Initial POLREP
Keizer Mercury Spill
Salem, OR
Latitude: 44.9874315 Longitude: -123.0252341
|
To:
|
|
From:
|
Jeffrey Fowlow, On-Scene Coordinator
|
Date:
|
8/15/2016
|
Reporting Period:
|
8/12/2016 - 8/14/2016
|
1. Introduction
|
|
1.1 Background
|
|
|
Site Number: |
|
|
Contract Number: |
|
D.O. Number: |
|
|
Action Memo Date: |
|
Response Authority: |
CERCLA |
|
Response Type: |
Emergency |
Response Lead: |
EPA |
|
Incident Category: |
Removal Action |
NPL Status: |
|
|
Operable Unit: |
|
Mobilization Date: |
8/12/2016 |
|
Start Date: |
8/12/2016 |
Demob Date: |
|
|
Completion Date: |
|
CERCLIS ID: |
|
|
RCRIS ID: |
|
ERNS No.: |
|
|
State Notification: |
|
FPN#: |
|
|
Reimbursable Account #: |
|
1.1.1 Incident Category
CERCLA
1.1.2 Site Description
The site is located in an apartment complex in a residential area nearby to commercial businesses and busy thoroughfares that carry motor vehicle, bicycle, and pedestrian traffic.
1.1.2.1 Location
The
incident occurred at Wyatt Lee apartment community located on Manbrin Drive
NE, Keizer, Marion County, State of Oregon 97303.
1.1.2.2 Description of Threat
Liquid
elemental mercury has been spilled on private property. The
affected spill area was uncontrolled and was accessible by a diverse tenant
community as well as by visitors. These populations were at risk of exposure to
elemental liquid mercury by dermal contact or accidental ingestion and were at
risk of exposure to elemental mercury vapor by inhalation.
1.1.3 Preliminary Removal Assessment/Removal Site Inspection Results
Elemental
mercury was identified on-scene using three different techniques:
- Liquid
elemental mercury was identified by visual observation – an approximately
15-foot long by 3-foot wide area of asphalt pavement was contaminated with
beads and globules of highly reflective liquid which was consistent with liquid
elemental mercury.
- A
Jerome 431-X Mercury Vapor Analyzer (gold-foil conductance technology) detected
0.064 mg/m3 (64,000 ng/m3) of mercury vapor directly above the beads.
- An
Ohio Lumex RA-915+ Portable Mercury Vapor Analyzer (using differential atomic
absorption spectrometry technology) detected 15,000 ng/m3 of mercury vapor approximately
1 foot away from the beads.
|
2. Current Activities
|
|
2.1 Operations Section
|
|
|
2.1.1 Narrative
EPA
began scene operations on August 12th, 2016 upon arrival. Initial assessment of the mercury contamination continued through the
evening and resumed the following morning.
START contractors used specialized mercury detection equipment to identify the areas where mercury contamination was present. START contractors also screened apartments associated with the garages where the mercury had been spilled as well as the apartments across the common thoroughfare from the garage area.
A Hazmat cleanup contractor arrived on scene on Saturday morning, August 13th, 2016 on behalf of the owner/management company for the apartment complex. A specialized mercury vacuum was used by the cleanup contractor to remove the visible mercury liquid and employed proven mercury decontamination techniques in an attempt to clear the affected areas of mercury contamination. The cleanup contractor demobilized at the end of the day on Saturday due to limitations with funding from property management/owner.
2.1.2 Response Actions to Date
Activities during reporting period August 12-14, 2016:
- Mobilized to the scene on August 12th, 2016 and secured the scene with visible warning tape.
- Identified spilled material as elemental liquid
mercury.
- Identified mercury vapor in the ambient air at
the scene (greater than 10,000 ng/m3 mercury vapor in ambient air).
- Assessed individual apartment units (ambient
indoor air, entrance way floor materials, resident’s shoes, outdoor shoe mats, outdoor
steps) for mercury contamination. A total of 8 apartment units were screened and all were <200 ng/m3. These units were located in the area of the
spill and have associated garage units where the spill occurred. Other apartment units screened are immediately across the
access road to the apartment complex.
- Assessed
three vehicles for mercury contamination on tires, interior carpets and seats,
and interior ambient air with all results less than 1,000 ng/m3.
- Assessed
asphalt pavement in the vicinity of the spill to determine the spill extent and
to assess whether significant amounts of mercury had been tracked away from the
spill area (area both less than and greater than 10,000 ng/m3 mercury vapor.
- Assessed concrete pavement and interior air of
five detached garages. Ambient concentrations in garages ranged from less than 1,000 ng/m3 mercury vapor to greater than 10,000 ng/m3 mercury
vapor.
- Removed
visible mercury beads using vacuum (power mercury vacuum and manually with tape)
and sorbent (mercury absorbent powder.
- Treated
surfaces exhibiting high mercury with:
“Hg CS-102” solution, ambient heating, and ventilation.
- Assessed the home and property of the former tenant. With the consent of the former tenant, contaminated items were removed for disposal.
- Collected sediment samples from the storm water catch basin nearest the spill site and the next catch basin downstream. Both samples were screened using the Lumex. The sample nearest the spill site showed concentrations of 47,000ng/m3, whereas the next sample downstream showed concentrations of 120 ng/m3.
2.1.3 Enforcement Activities, Identity of Potentially Responsible Parties (PRPs)
PRPs to be determined.
2.1.4 Progress Metrics
Waste Stream |
Medium |
Quantity |
Manifest # |
Treatment |
Disposal |
Plastic Drum |
PPE and Cleanup Materials |
1 |
TBD |
TBD |
TBD |
8 oz glass jar |
Liquid elemental mercury |
3 |
TBD |
TBD |
TBD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.2 Planning Section
|
|
|
2.2.1 Anticipated Activities
Continue removal in areas of known mercury contamination:
- Two garages.
- Asphalt parking area near garages.
- Contaminated sediment in storm water catch basin.
Remove all mercury and mercury contamination to acceptable concentrations.
2.2.1.1 Planned Response Activities
Treatment of visible mercury and adjacent areas with mercury-absorbing powder.
Removal of all visible mercury beads using a mercury vacuum.
Treatment of all areas (with Hg-CS102 spray and manual wipe-down) that had mercury beads and/or exhibited mercury vapor of 6,000 ng/m3 or greater.
Application of heat and ventilation treatment techniques to all area that continue to exhibit mercury vapor of 6,000 ng/m3 or greater.
Assess storm-drain pathways for mercury contamination.
2.2.1.2 Next Steps
Complete removal of free elemental mercury and mercury-contaminated debris from site. Dispose of all wastes at an appropriate facility.
2.2.2 Issues
Identification of any additional apartments or other areas that might need assessment for mercury contamination in relation to the spill that occurred.
The current hazmat removal contractor is in negotiations with the PRPs. If contractual terms and conditions are not agreed, EPA may have to assume responsibility to conduct and/or complete the cleanup.
|
|
2.3 Logistics Section
|
|
|
Oregon State Hazmat Team 13 assets were deployed to the
scene and were later demobilized from on August 12, 2016 as
authorized by the on-scene coordinators.
EPA Region 10 Portland and Seattle assets were deployed to
the scene on August 12, 2016 and will remain on-scene until
demobilized by the EPA OSC.
|
|
2.4 Finance Section
|
|
|
No information available at this time.
|
|
2.5 Other Command Staff
|
|
|
2.5.1 Safety Officer
Initially
Oregon State Hazmat Team 13 on August 12th, 2016, then transitioned to EPA on August 13th, 2016.
2.5.2 Liaison Officer
2.5.3 Information Officer
Initially Oregon State Hazmat Team 13 on August 12th, 2016, then transitioned to EPA on August 13th, 2016.
|
3. Participating Entities
|
|
3.1 Unified Command
Unified Command (UC) operated on the evening of August 12th, 2016 from approximately 19:15 to 23:00 hours (all times Pacific time zone). Unified Command consisted of three
entities: the Hazmat Team 13 Incident
Commander (IC), the EPA Federal OSC, and a PRP (property management company)
representative.
UC was reduced to two entities at approximately 23:00 hours
on August 12th, 2016 when Hazmat Team 13 (including the IC) departed the scene.
3.2 Cooperating Agencies
The
Cities of Salem and Keizer (code enforcement and environmental staff) provided
planning and technical support.
|
4. Personnel On Site
|
|
Oregon
State Hazmat Team 13 – approximately 8-12 responders
City of Keizer Public Works
EPA - 2 OSCs
START - 3 personnel
Apartment Representative - 1
NRCES - 2 supervisors and 4 technicians
|
5. Definition of Terms
|
|
CERCLA – Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (and as amended), commonly referred to as “Superfund”
EPA – U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (Region 10)
IC – Incident Commander
OSC – On-Scene Coordinator
PRP – Potentially Responsible Party (under CERCLA law)
ng/m3 – nanograms per cubic meter (at this site, nanograms [mass] of mercury vapor per cubic meter [volume] of air)
NRCES – National Response Corporation Environmental Services (do not confuse with the United States Coast Guard National Response Center)
START – Superfund Technical Assessment Response Team (EPA science and technology support contractor)
UC – Unified Command
ug/m3 - micrograms per cubic meter (at this site, micrograms [mass] of mercury vapor per cubic meter [volume] of air)
|
6. Additional sources of information
|
|
No information available at this time.
|
7. Situational Reference Materials
|
|
No information available at this time.
|
|
|