U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

HTTPS

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock () or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Lance Oil Gasoline Spill

All POL/SITREP's for this site Lance Oil Gasoline Spill
Atlanta, GA - EPA Region IV
POLREP #6
Progress POLREP
Printer Friendly  |   PDF
 
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
POLLUTION/SITUATION REPORT
Lance Oil Gasoline Spill - Removal Polrep

EPA Emergency Response

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region IV

Subject: POLREP #6
Progress POLREP
Lance Oil Gasoline Spill

Atlanta, GA
Latitude: 33.7961071 Longitude: -84.3697697


To:
From: Rick Jardine,
Date: 1/17/2012
Reporting Period: 4/26/2011 to 1/17/2012

1. Introduction
  1.1 Background
   
Site Number: Z4SJ    Contract Number: EP-S4-0704
D.O. Number: 0704-F4-0084    Action Memo Date:  
Response Authority: OPA    Response Type: Emergency
Response Lead: EPA    Incident Category: Removal Action
NPL Status: Non NPL    Operable Unit:
Mobilization Date: 4/21/2010    Start Date: 4/17/2010
Demob Date:      Completion Date:  
CERCLIS ID:    RCRIS ID:
ERNS No.:    State Notification:
FPN#: E10416    Reimbursable Account #:


1.1.1 Incident Category - Emergency Response to an Oil Pollution Incident

1.1.2 Site Description - Lance Oil Gasoline Discharge

1.1.2.1 Location - 1539 Piedmont Ave, Atlanta, Fulton County, GA

1.1.2.2 Description of Threat - Oil in surface water

1.1.3 Preliminary Removal Assessment/Removal Site Inspection Results

On or prior to Saturday 17APR10 RP Lance Oil Company retained GA Oilmen’s Services (GOS) to advise regarding discrepancies in fuel volume accounting for a 4,000 gallon UST.  The RP retained SWS to conduct initial defensive tactics (placing absorbent boom in creek) and GOS to manage the overall project including determining and mitigating the root cause.  GOS has made the determination that an old steel UST that failed tightness testing was the source of the oil discharge and had the remaining gasoline removed from the tank.  GOS coordinated their efforts with the GAEPD UST Program and City of Atlanta Watershed Management Environmental Section.

 

On Wednesday 21APR10 a concerned citizen contacted EPA who mobilized to the scene  and, in turn, notified GA EPD Emergency Response Program.  Free product was observed flowing into the creek and the original absorbent boom was saturated to capacity with oil.  EPA instructed GOS to immediately replace the boom and apply additional absorbent materials to minimize the flow of oil into the creek.  OSC Jardine and GOS then discussed a more robust strategy of excavating cutoff trenches to intercept the flow of oil prior to it entering the creek.  GOS has conducted the preparatory activity including utility search and access approvals.

 

On Thursday 22APR10 OSC Jardine issued a Notice of Federal Interest to Lance Oil (c/o GOS Mark Faas) and reconned site with GOS and Pittman Grading.  EPA clarified objectives and Pittman set out to develop tactics.  GOS continued to coordinate activity and change out oil-saturated materials.  OSC Jardine identified concern regarding oil sheen continuing to escape confinement. 

2. Current Activities
  2.1 Operations Section
    2.1.1 Narrative - During the last reporting period interested parties have held several meetings to identify issues and appropriate resolutions.  Entities involved include the responsible party (Lance Oil), his consultant (Georgia Oilmen's Association), the affected property owners (Mews Development and the City of Atlanta Division of Watershed Management), GA EPD UST Program, and EPA R4 Emergency Response and Removal Program.  The government entities have agreed to allow the GA UST Program to lead the clean-up activity as the State has committed substantial financial resources.  Each government agency intends to remain involved and retain their authorities for action should the issues of concern fail to be resolved.   

Issues that have been identified are:
    - the gasoline plume is uncontrolled;
    - the majority of the plume is located under the parking lot of the adjacent owner's multi-tenant facility;
    - the intercept trench has been allowed to degrade and oil has re-entered the stream;
    - the extent of the plume has not been fully determined;
    - the activities to date have consumed an enormous portion of the UST fund. 

2.1.2 Response Actions to Date - During this reporting period, GOS has:
    - conducted several extraction events limited to areas that they could access;
    - designed, obtained permits for, and begun installation of the vapor extraction/destruction system;
    - and, maintained the oil absorbent boom in Clear Creek. 

2.1.3 Enforcement Activities, Identity of Potentially Responsible Parties (PRPs)

2.1.4 Progress Metrics

Waste Stream Medium Quantity Manifest # Treatment Disposal
           
           
           



  2.2 Planning Section
    2.2.1 Anticipated Activities - GOS intends to restore and maintain the intercept trench, define the plume along the stream bank, maintain absorbents, and begin operating the extraction system.

2.2.1.1 Planned Response Activities - see anticipated activites (above).

2.2.1.2 Next Steps -

2.2.2 Issues

  2.3 Logistics Section
    No information available at this time.

  2.4 Finance Section
    No information available at this time.

  2.5 Other Command Staff
    No information available at this time.

3. Participating Entities
  No information available at this time.

4. Personnel On Site
  No information available at this time.

5. Definition of Terms
  No information available at this time.

6. Additional sources of information
  No information available at this time.

7. Situational Reference Materials
  No information available at this time.