2.1.1 Narrative
Beginning assessment of PCBs and diesel in soil and groundwater.
2.1.2 Response Actions to Date
8/1/11: Personnel on site: EPA – 2, DEQ – 2, CUC – 2, START – 1, ERRS – 3. Mobilization to site, Geoprobe rig and other equipment unloaded from shipping containers. Commenced direct-push Geoprobe borings to identify location for first monitoring well.
8/2/11: Personnel on site: EPA – 3, DEQ – 2, CUC – 2, START – 1, ERRS – 3. First monitoring well (MW-1) installed. Multiple Geoprobe borings in several locations on site indicate presence of diesel in dissolved phase in groundwater in concentrations high enough to smell strongly. Grid laid out for surface soil sampling in and around current and former transformer storage areas.
8/3/11: Personnel on site: EPA – 3, DEQ – 2, CUC – 1, START – 1, ERRS – 3. Second monitoring well (MW-2) installed. Continued soil borings to plan placement of monitoring wells and assess extent of diesel contamination of groundwater. Continued to find high concentrations of dissolved-phase diesel in groundwater. Collected surface soil samples for PCBs and total petroleum hydrocarbons on established grid. Prepared soil samples for shipment. ERT dug several 1-2 foot deep holes, approximately 10 feet from the ocean, on beach down gradient of site. Groundwater in 3 holes showed a spotty sheen within 5 minutes, indicating that it is almost certain that diesel is being released to the ocean.
8/4/11: Personnel on site: EPA – 3, DEQ – 2, CUC – 1, START – 1, ERRS – 3. MW-1 development complete. Soil samples shipped to mainland for analysis. Continued soil borings to plan placement of monitoring wells and assess extent of diesel contamination of groundwater. Continued to find high concentrations of dissolved-phase diesel in groundwater.
8/5/11: Personnel on site: EPA – 3, DEQ – 2, CUC – 1, START – 1, ERRS – 3. MW-2 development complete. MW-3 drilled. Observed discharge from rudimentary oil/water separator into pit dug on site. Water in all stages of separator showed sheen, and oil staining was visible on walls of separator basin. Surface of water in discharge pit showed a sheen. Sample taken of water in pit.
8/6/11: Personnel on site: EPA – 3, DEQ – 2, START – 1, ERRS – 3. MW-3 developed. Drilled and completed MW-4 and MW-5. Again observed discharge from rudimentary oil/water separator into pit dug on site. Surface of water in discharge pit showed a sheen. Sample taken of discharge from oil/water separator. Soil sampling continued.
8/7/11: Personnel on site: EPA – 3, DEQ – 2, START – 1, ERRS – 3. MW-4 and MW-5 developed. Soil sampling continued. Heavy rains happered site activities.
8/8/11: Personnel on site: EPA – 3, DEQ – 2, START – 1, ERRS – 3. Groundwater monitoring well sampling begun. Samples were collected and packaged. ERRS completed monitoring wells and consolidated development water into drums. Drums were sampled and placed in secondary containment area. Drill rig was decontaminated and packed for off island shipment.
8/9/11: Personnel on site: EPA – 3, DEQ – 3, START – 1. Groundwater monitoring well sampling was completed. Samples were shipped off site. ERRS demobed. Additional CNMI DEQ mobed to assist with groundwater sampling
8/10/11: Personnel on site: EPA – 2, DEQ – 2, START – 1. Remaining groundwater samples were shipped off. Supplies were shipped off or stored. Equipment was packed and shipped. Site was buttoned up.
8/11/11: Personnel on site: EPA – 3, DEQ – 2, START – 1, ERRS – 3. Remainig site personnel demobilitized.
2.1.3 Enforcement Activities, Identity of Potentially Responsible Parties (PRPs)
The CNMI Commonwealth Utilities Corporation (CUC) is under a Department of Justice and EPA order to address contamination and other issues at the Rota power plant. CUC requested that EPA undertake the assessment and clean-up of soil and groundwater contamination at the site.
2.1.4 Progress Metrics
Waste Stream |
Medium |
Quantity |
Manifest # |
Treatment |
Disposal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|