U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

HTTPS

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock () or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Baycote Metal Finishing Site

All POL/SITREP's for this site Baycote Metal Finishing Site
Mishawaka, IN - EPA Region V
POLREP #1
Initial
Printer Friendly  |   PDF
 
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
POLLUTION/SITUATION REPORT
Baycote Metal Finishing Site - Removal Polrep
Initial Removal Polrep

EPA Emergency Response

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region V

Subject: POLREP #1
Initial
Baycote Metal Finishing Site
C5B2
Mishawaka, IN
Latitude: 41.6497046 Longitude: -86.1648540


To:
From: Paul Atkociunas, OSC
Date: 5/31/2012
Reporting Period: May 29 - June 1, 2012

1. Introduction
  1.1 Background
   
Site Number: C5B2    Contract Number: EP-S5-09-05
D.O. Number:      Action Memo Date: 2/23/2012
Response Authority: CERCLA    Response Type: Time-Critical
Response Lead: EPA    Incident Category: Removal Action
NPL Status: Non NPL    Operable Unit:
Mobilization Date: 5/29/2012    Start Date: 5/29/2012
Demob Date:      Completion Date:  
CERCLIS ID:    RCRIS ID:
ERNS No.:    State Notification:
FPN#:    Reimbursable Account #:

1.1.1 Incident Category

Time-Critical Removal Action:  Manufacturing/Processing/Maintenance – Electroplating, Metal Finishing


1.1.2 Site Description

Baycote Metal Finishing (Baycote or the Site) began operation in 1982.  The facility electroplated and anodized steel and steel casings with zinc, cadmium, and chromium for the automotive, recreational vehicle, and trailer industries.  The facility ceased operations in January 2008, however, according to facility records approximately 111,000 gallons of waste remained on site at the time.  In October 2009, the Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM) and the owner of the site entered into an Order to remove and dispose of all hazardous waste.  However, work ceased and in February 2010, approximately 50,000 gallons of waste remained on-site.

1.1.2.1 Location

The Baycote Metal Finishing Site is located at 1302 Industrial Drive in Mishawaka, St. Joseph County, Indiana 46544.  The geographical coordinates for the Site are 41°39’0.03” North latitude and 86°09’57.11” West longitude.  The Site is bordered by industrial properties to the north, east, and south and Industrial Drive and industrial properties to the west.  Residential properties are located approximately 700 feet to the west.  Seven churches and two schools are located within 1 mile of the Site. The St. Joseph River, a major surface water body that terminates in Lake Michigan, is located 0.85 mile northwest of the Site. 

1.1.2.2 Description of Threat

Abandoned and unknown waste in vats, pits, tanks, drums and containers was located throughout the building.  Many vats, pits, tanks and containers are open with contents exposed.  Animal prints were observed in material piles on the building floor.  Several drums are corroded and leaking onto the floor.  Evidence of previous spills was noted in several areas.  The building is in a deteriorating condition; a section of roof in the Wastewater Treatment Room had collapsed, exposing the room and its contents to weather.  Due to the roof collapse and holes in the roof in other areas, rain water has accumulated in several sections of the building.  Vats, totes, and containers that contain incompatible wastes (acids, caustics, cyanides) are present inside the facility.  Based on these conditions, nearby populations and the environment could be exposed to potentially hazardous materials if contaminants migrate off site.


1.1.3 Preliminary Removal Assessment/Removal Site Inspection Results

U.S. EPA On-Scene Coordinators (OSCs) Theresa Holz and Jacob Hassan conducted a Site visit on November 21, 2011, with the St. Joseph County Health Department (SJCHD).  During the visit, the OSCs documented numerous tanks, drums, containers and spilled material on the floor.  The OSCs also observed containers labeled as acid, chromate, nitrate, hexavalent chrome, and cyanide.  The Site was in disrepair, with a portion of the roof collapsed inside the facility.    The containers were not organized, secured, or maintained in a manner necessary to prevent spillage, inter-mixture of potentially flammable or combustible materials, and/or release.  The containers also were not all properly or sufficiently labeled or identified, for safety purposes.

 

On December 12 and 13, 2011, the Superfund Technical Assessment and Response Team (START) and U.S. EPA OSCs Holz, Hassan, and Atkociunas, performed a Site Assessment including sample collection.  Activities performed during the Site Assessment included:

           

•           Documenting Site conditions;

•           Conducting air monitoring;

•           Inventorying drums and other small containers; and

•           Collecting samples from vats, pits, tanks, drums and containers and spilled material. 

 

U.S. EPA collected fifteen samples from drums, plating vats, small containers and spilled material and submitted them for analysis.

 

The Site Assessment documented numerous drums, plating vats, pits, tanks, small containers, and spilled material.  Drums and containers were labeled as acid, chrome, and caustic.  Numerous plating vats and other process equipment were documented inside the building. 

 

Analytical results from liquid sample BMF-WL02-121211 documented reactive cyanide and total cyanide at concentrations of 8,000 and 15,000 milligrams per liter (mg/L), respectively.  The analytical results from liquid sample BMF-WL05-121211 documented reactive cyanide and total cyanide at concentrations of 140 and 30,000 mg/L, respectively.  According to 40 CFR § 261.23 (a)(5), these samples represent a cyanide- or sulfide-bearing waste that, when exposed to pH conditions between 2 and 12.5 SUs, could generate toxic gases, vapors, or fumes “in a quantity sufficient to present a danger to human health or the environment.”  These two samples document cyanide bearing waste, which verifies the characteristic of a hazardous waste for reactivity (D003).

 

Analytical results from liquid samples BMF-WL04-121211, BMF-WL07-121211, BMF-WL10-121211, and solid sample BMF-WS02-121211 documented pH values of less than 2.  According to 40 CFR § 261.22(a), these waste samples represent material that meets the definition of characteristically hazardous waste for corrosivity (D002) because the pH value is less than or equal to 2 standard units (SU) or greater than or equal to 12.5 SUs. 

 

Analytical results from solid sample BMF-WS01-121211 documented a cadmium concentration of 83 mg/L.  This TCLP cadmium concentration exceeds the TCLP cadmium regulatory limit of 1.0 mg/L.  Therefore, according to 40 CFR § 261.24(b), this sample represent materials that meet the definition of characteristically hazardous waste for toxicity (D006).   

 

Analytical results from solid samples BMF-WS-02-121211, BMF-WS-03-121211, and BMF-WS-04-121211 documented chromium concentrations of 20,000, 420, and 300 mg/L, respectively.  These TCLP chromium concentrations exceed the TCLP chromium regulatory limit of 5.0 mg/L.  Therefore, according to 40 CFR § 261.24(b), these samples represent materials that meet the definition of characteristically hazardous waste for toxicity (D007). 

 

Analytical results from liquid sample BMF-WL08-121211 showed a flashpoint of less than 32 degrees Fahrenheit (°F).  According to 40 CFR § 261.21 (a), this waste sample represents material that meets the definition of characteristically hazardous waste for ignitability (D001) because the flashpoint is below 140 °F.

 

2. Current Activities
  2.1 Operations Section
    2.1.1 Narrative

In a letter dated November 11, 2011, the St. Joseph County Health Department (SJCHD) requested assistance from the U.S. EPA to secure hazardous wastes left on-site.  SJCHD was concerned that the Site posed a significant threat to the health and safety of companies within the industrial park as well as the residential area located less than a 1,000 feet from the facility.  On February 23, 2012, the Director of U.S. EPA's Superfund Division approved an Action Memorandum approving funding for a time-critical removal action at the Baycote Metal Finishing Site.

 

On April 6, 2012, U.S. EPA issued a Unilateral Administrative Order to the potentially responsible parties to conduct a removal action at the Site.  The potentially responsible parties presented and inability to pay argument and indicated that they did not intend to conduct a removal action at the Site.  EPA began time-critical removal actions at the Baycote Site on May 29, 2012. 

 

Removal activities on Site will include: Develop and implement a Site Health and Safety Plan and Site Security Plan; Develop and implement a Site Work Plan, a Sampling Plan, Air Monitoring Plan and a Site Emergency Contingency Plan; Inventory and perform hazard categorization on substances contained in vats, pits, drums, and other containers; Perform sampling and analysis to determine disposal options; Consolidate and package hazardous substances, pollutants, and contaminants for transportation and off-site disposal; Dismantle and decontaminate process equipment and building components associated with the plating areas, as necessary; Transport and dispose of all characterized or identified hazardous substances, pollutants, or contaminants to a RCRA/CERCLA-approved disposal facility in accordance with U.S. EPA Off-Site Rule (40 CFR § 300.440); and  Take any other response actions to address any release or threatened release of a hazardous substance, pollutant and contaminant that the U.S. EPA OSC determines may pose an imminent and substantial endangerment to the public health or the environment.   

 
2.1.2 Response Actions to Date

During the reporting period, EPA conducted the following activities:

 

•Mobilized Superfund Technical Assessment and Response Team (START) and Emergency and Rapid Response Services (ERRS) contractors to the Site; 

•Mobilized equipment to the Site;

•Worked with the City of Mishawaka Fire Department to distribute an Emergency Contingency Plan to local response agencies;

•Established work zones:

•Set up electric, sanitary, water, and internet services;

•Erected temporary fencing;

•Implemented a Green Initiative during the removal action including recycling of paper, plastic, glass, aluminum, ink cartridges / etc.


2.1.3 Enforcement Activities, Identity of Potentially Responsible Parties (PRPs)

Information on the PRP is in the Site file.  Enforcement strategies are included in a confidential enforcement memorandum.

 

2.1.4 Progress Metrics
Pending.

Waste Stream Medium Quantity Manifest # Treatment Disposal
           
           
           


  2.2 Planning Section
    2.2.1 Anticipated Activities

2.2.1.1 Planned Response Activities

Removal activities on Site will include:

1          Develop and implement a Site Health and Safety Plan and Site Security Plan;

2          Develop and implement a Site Work Plan, a Sampling Plan, Air Monitoring Plan and a Site Emergency Contingency Plan;

3          Inventory and perform hazard categorization on substances contained in vats, pits, drums, and other containers;

4          Perform sampling and analysis to determine disposal options;

5          Consolidate and package hazardous substances, pollutants, and contaminants for transportation and off-site disposal;

6          Dismantle and decontaminate process equipment and building components associated with the plating areas, as necessary;

7          Transport and dispose of all characterized or identified hazardous substances, pollutants, or contaminants to a RCRA/CERCLA-approved disposal facility in accordance with U.S. EPA Off-Site Rule (40 CFR § 300.440); and 

8          Take any other response actions to address any release or threatened release of a hazardous substance, pollutant and contaminant that the U.S. EPA OSC determines may pose an imminent and substantial endangerment to the public health or the environment.   


2.2.1.2 Next Steps

Cleanup of the plating shop and off-site disposal of wastes is anticipated to take approximately 6 months to complete.  When time-critical removal actions are completed, EPA will refer the Site to the Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM).  Sampling of waste in vats, totes, and containers for waste characterization is scheduled for the week of June 4. 


2.2.2 Issues
None.

  2.3 Logistics Section
    NA

  2.4 Finance Section
    No information available at this time.

  2.5 Other Command Staff
    2.5.1 Safety Officer

The Health and Safety Plan was approved and signed by all site personnel.  Safety meetings are held daily.

2.5.2 Liaison Officer
NA

2.5.3 Information Officer
NA

3. Participating Entities
  3.1 Unified Command
NA

3.2 Cooperating Agencies

IDEM

City of Mishawaka

St. Joseph County Health Department

Mishawaka Fire Department


4. Personnel On Site
 

The following numbers of personnel were on-Site during the reporting period:

 

Organization                         Role                                         Quantity   

U.S. EPA                             OSC                                         1

Environmental Restoration      Response Manager (RM)            1

                                            Field Cost Accountant (FCA)      1             
                                            Foreman                                   1

                                            Laborers                                    3

Weston Solutions                  START                                      1


5. Definition of Terms
 

Baycote            Baycote Metal Finishing Site

CERCLA           Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act

EPA                 Environmental Protection Agency

ERRS               Emergency and Rapid Response Services

FCA                 Field Cost Accountant

HASP               Health and Safety Plan

IDEM                Indiana Department of Environmental Management

NA                    Not Applicable

OSC                 On-Scene Coordinator

PolRep              Pollution Report

RCRA                Resource Conservation and Recovery Act

PRP                  Potentially Responsible Party

RM                    Response Manager

START              Superfund Technical Assessment and Response Team

6. Additional sources of information
  6.1 Internet location of additional information/report

www.epaosc.org/BaycoteMetalFinishing

6.2 Reporting Schedule

PolReps will be submitted on a weekly or bi-weekly basis.


7. Situational Reference Materials
  No information available at this time.


Click here to view Attached Images