U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

HTTPS

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock () or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Baycote Metal Finishing Site

All POL/SITREP's for this site Baycote Metal Finishing Site
Mishawaka, IN - EPA Region V
POLREP #4
Progress
Printer Friendly  |   PDF
 
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
POLLUTION/SITUATION REPORT
Baycote Metal Finishing Site - Removal Polrep

EPA Emergency Response

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region V

Subject: POLREP #4
Progress
Baycote Metal Finishing Site
C5B2
Mishawaka, IN
Latitude: 41.6497046 Longitude: -86.1648540


To:
From: Ramon C. Mendoza, OSC
Date: 6/22/2012
Reporting Period: 6/18/2012 to 6/22/2012

1. Introduction
  1.1 Background
   
Site Number: C5B2    Contract Number: EP-S5-09-05
D.O. Number:      Action Memo Date: 2/23/2012
Response Authority: CERCLA    Response Type: Time-Critical
Response Lead: EPA    Incident Category: Removal Action
NPL Status: Non NPL    Operable Unit:
Mobilization Date: 5/29/2012    Start Date: 5/29/2012
Demob Date:      Completion Date:  
CERCLIS ID:    RCRIS ID:
ERNS No.:    State Notification:
FPN#:    Reimbursable Account #:

1.1.1 Incident Category

Time-Critical Removal Action:  Manufacturing/Processing/Maintenance – Electroplating, Metal Finishing


1.1.2 Site Description

Baycote Metal Finishing (Baycote or the Site) began operation in 1982.  The facility electroplated and anodized steel and steel casings with zinc, cadmium, and chromium for the automotive, recreational vehicle, and trailer industries.  The facility ceased operations in January 2008, however, according to facility records approximately 111,000 gallons of waste remained on site at the time.  In October 2009, the Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM) and the owner of the site entered into an Order to remove and dispose of all hazardous waste.  However, work ceased and in February 2010, approximately 50,000 gallons of waste remained on-site.

1.1.2.1 Location

The Baycote Metal Finishing Site is located at 1302 Industrial Drive in Mishawaka, St. Joseph County, Indiana 46544.  The geographical coordinates for the Site are 41°39’0.03” North latitude and 86°09’57.11” West longitude.  The Site is bordered by industrial properties to the north, east, and south and Industrial Drive and industrial properties to the west.  Residential properties are located approximately 700 feet to the west.  Seven churches and two schools are located within 1 mile of the Site. The St. Joseph River, a major surface water body that terminates in Lake Michigan, is located 0.85 mile northwest of the Site. 

1.1.2.2 Description of Threat

Abandoned and unknown waste in vats, pits, tanks, drums and containers was located throughout the building.  Many vats, pits, tanks and containers are open with contents exposed.  Animal prints were observed in material piles on the building floor.  Several drums are corroded and leaking onto the floor.  Evidence of previous spills was noted in several areas.  The building is in a deteriorating condition; a section of roof in the Wastewater Treatment Room had collapsed, exposing the room and its contents to weather.  Due to the roof collapse and holes in the roof in other areas, rain water has accumulated in several sections of the building.  Vats, totes, and containers that contain incompatible wastes (acids, caustics, cyanides) are present inside the facility.  Based on these conditions, nearby populations and the environment could be exposed to potentially hazardous materials if contaminants migrate off site.


1.1.3 Preliminary Removal Assessment/Removal Site Inspection Results

U.S. EPA On-Scene Coordinators (OSCs) Theresa Holz and Jacob Hassan conducted a Site visit on November 21, 2011, with the St. Joseph County Health Department (SJCHD).  During the visit, the OSCs documented numerous tanks, drums, containers and spilled material on the floor.  The OSCs also observed containers labeled as acid, chromate, nitrate, hexavalent chrome, and cyanide.  The Site was in disrepair, with a portion of the roof collapsed inside the facility.    The containers were not organized, secured, or maintained in a manner necessary to prevent spillage, inter-mixture of potentially flammable or combustible materials, and/or release.  The containers also were not all properly or sufficiently labeled or identified, for safety purposes.

 

On December 12 and 13, 2011, the Superfund Technical Assessment and Response Team (START) and U.S. EPA OSCs Holz, Hassan, and Atkociunas, performed a Site Assessment including sample collection.  Activities performed during the Site Assessment included:

           

•           Documenting Site conditions;

•           Conducting air monitoring;

•           Inventorying drums and other small containers; and

•           Collecting samples from vats, pits, tanks, drums and containers and spilled material. 

 

U.S. EPA collected fifteen samples from drums, plating vats, small containers and spilled material and submitted them for analysis.

 

The Site Assessment documented numerous drums, plating vats, pits, tanks, small containers, and spilled material.  Drums and containers were labeled as acid, chrome, and caustic.  Numerous plating vats and other process equipment were documented inside the building. 

 

Analytical results from liquid sample BMF-WL02-121211 documented reactive cyanide and total cyanide at concentrations of 8,000 and 15,000 milligrams per liter (mg/L), respectively.  The analytical results from liquid sample BMF-WL05-121211 documented reactive cyanide and total cyanide at concentrations of 140 and 30,000 mg/L, respectively.  According to 40 CFR § 261.23 (a)(5), these samples represent a cyanide- or sulfide-bearing waste that, when exposed to pH conditions between 2 and 12.5 SUs, could generate toxic gases, vapors, or fumes “in a quantity sufficient to present a danger to human health or the environment.”  These two samples document cyanide bearing waste, which verifies the characteristic of a hazardous waste for reactivity (D003).

 

Analytical results from liquid samples BMF-WL04-121211, BMF-WL07-121211, BMF-WL10-121211, and solid sample BMF-WS02-121211 documented pH values of less than 2.  According to 40 CFR § 261.22(a), these waste samples represent material that meets the definition of characteristically hazardous waste for corrosivity (D002) because the pH value is less than or equal to 2 standard units (SU) or greater than or equal to 12.5 SUs. 

 

Analytical results from solid sample BMF-WS01-121211 documented a cadmium concentration of 83 mg/L.  This TCLP cadmium concentration exceeds the TCLP cadmium regulatory limit of 1.0 mg/L.  Therefore, according to 40 CFR § 261.24(b), this sample represent materials that meet the definition of characteristically hazardous waste for toxicity (D006).   

 

Analytical results from solid samples BMF-WS-02-121211, BMF-WS-03-121211, and BMF-WS-04-121211 documented chromium concentrations of 20,000, 420, and 300 mg/L, respectively.  These TCLP chromium concentrations exceed the TCLP chromium regulatory limit of 5.0 mg/L.  Therefore, according to 40 CFR § 261.24(b), these samples represent materials that meet the definition of characteristically hazardous waste for toxicity (D007). 

 

Analytical results from liquid sample BMF-WL08-121211 showed a flashpoint of less than 32 degrees Fahrenheit (°F).  According to 40 CFR § 261.21 (a), this waste sample represents material that meets the definition of characteristically hazardous waste for ignitability (D001) because the flashpoint is below 140 °F.

In a letter dated November 11, 2011, the St. Joseph County Health Department (SJCHD) requested assistance from the U.S. EPA to secure hazardous wastes left on-site.  SJCHD was concerned that the Site posed a significant threat to the health and safety of companies within the industrial park as well as the residential area located less than a 1,000 feet from the facility.  On February 23, 2012, the Director of U.S. EPA's Superfund Division approved an Action Memorandum approving funding for a time-critical removal action at the Baycote Metal Finishing Site.


2. Current Activities
  2.1 Operations Section
    2.1.1 Narrative

In a letter dated November 11, 2011, the St. Joseph County Health Department (SJCHD) requested assistance from the U.S. EPA to secure hazardous wastes left on-site.  SJCHD was concerned that the Site posed a significant threat to the health and safety of companies within the industrial park as well as the residential area located less than a 1,000 feet from the facility.  On February 23, 2012, the Director of U.S. EPA's Superfund Division approved an Action Memorandum approving funding for a time-critical removal action at the Baycote Metal Finishing Site.

 

On April 6, 2012, U.S. EPA issued a Unilateral Administrative Order to the potentially responsible parties to conduct a removal action at the Site.  The potentially responsible parties presented and inability to pay argument and indicated that they did not intend to conduct a removal action at the Site.  EPA began time-critical removal actions at the Baycote Site on May 29, 2012. 

 

Removal activities on Site will include: Develop and implement a Site Health and Safety Plan and Site Security Plan; Develop and implement a Site Work Plan, a Sampling Plan, Air Monitoring Plan and a Site Emergency Contingency Plan; Inventory and perform hazard categorization on substances contained in vats, pits, drums, and other containers; Perform sampling and analysis to determine disposal options; Consolidate and package hazardous substances, pollutants, and contaminants for transportation and off-site disposal; Dismantle and decontaminate process equipment and building components associated with the plating areas, as necessary; Transport and dispose of all characterized or identified hazardous substances, pollutants, or contaminants to a RCRA/CERCLA-approved disposal facility in accordance with U.S. EPA Off-Site Rule (40 CFR § 300.440).  

This is a large Site, with 6 plating lines and an onsite waste water treatment plant/collapsed roof.  The OSC and its contractors have adopted a work plan to cleanup one area/plating line at a time, starting with the most contaminated while ensuring safety and efficiency.

 
2.1.2 Response Actions

Please refer to previous Polreps for response actions before June 18, 2012.

During the reporting period, EPA conducted the following activities:

-  Most of the containers have been identified, marked, measured, and sampled. The on-site chemist has conducted hazard categorization tests on over 500 samples so far.  The first batch of HAZCAT samples to be analyzed for disposal were sent out this week to the ERRS lab.
-  Work is continuing in the first cyanide/acid/caustic-contaminated plating line (Line 5-6-9) to cut and demolish contaminated wood decking and other hazardous waste debris for disposal at a hazardous waste debris facility.
-  Compatible cyanide contaminated waste liquid was pumped from plating vats in Line 5-6-9 and consolidated in clean polyethylene totes for staging for disposal.  
-  Hazardous solid waste residuals from the vats were scraped and consolidated in secure containers.
-  Chromium waste and oxidizers in the Solids Room were removed and secured in containers and the floor was swept and washed.
-  Compatible acid liquids were pumped from vats in Line 5-6-9 and consolidated in secure containers.
-  Compatible caustic liquids were pumped out of vats in Line 5-6-9 and consolidated in secure containers.
-  Selected emptied vats were spray washed and stage for potential recycling.
 -  A staging area for small hazardous containers has been established in the west region of the receiving area of the Site.
 -  EPA and START continued to conduct site perimeter and work area air monitoring to ensure worker and community protection.
-  One hazardous debris box and one solid waste debris box were shipped off-site for disposal.
-  An all hands tornado drill was conducted to ensure everyone onsite knew the location of the tornado shelter.
-  The HASP is undergoing amendment to ensure safety at the Site.
-  All waste water generated is being stored in totes for eventual disposal.

2.1.3 Enforcement Activities, Identity of Potentially Responsible Parties (PRPs)

Information on the PRP is in the Site file.  Enforcement strategies are included in a confidential enforcement memorandum.

2.1.4 Progress Metrics

Waste Stream Date Quantity Manifest # Treatment Disposal facility
 Solid Waste Debris  6/6/12  30 yards 001    WM Landfill
 Solid Waste Debris  6/8/12  30 yards 002    WM Landfill
 Haz Waste Debris 6/18/12  25 yards  004354475FLE    Envirosafe Services of Ohio, Oregon Ohio
 Solid Waste Debris  6/21/12  30 yards  003    WM Landfill


  2.2 Planning Section
    2.2.1 Anticipated Activities

2.2.1.1 Planned Response Activities

Removal activities on Site will include:

  1. Complete and sign amendments to the HASP
  2. Develop and implement a Site Work Plan with overall schedule;
  3. Continue inventory, sampling, and perform hazard categorization on substances contained in 
              vats, pits, drums, and other containers;
  4. Perform sampling and analysis to determine disposal options;
  5. Consolidate and package hazardous substances, pollutants, and contaminants for  
              transportation and off-site disposal;
  6. Investigate soils in the stressed vegetation in eastern area of the Site. 
  7. Dismantle and decontaminate process equipment and building components associated with
              the plating areas, as necessary;
  8. Transport and dispose of all characterized or identified hazardous substances, pollutants, or 
              contaminants to a RCRA/CERCLA-approved disposal facility in accordance with U.S. EPA 
              Off-Site Rule (40 CFR § 300.440)

2.2.1.2 Next Steps

Cleanup of the plating shop and off-site disposal of wastes is anticipated to take approximately 6 months to complete.  When time-critical removal actions are completed, EPA will refer the Site to the Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM). 

During the week of June 25,  
               - Continue to inventory and sample containers, vats, and tanks.
               - Continue Hazard Categorization of samples.
               - Consolidate / repackage containers
               - Repack / transfer containers into D.O.T. shippable containers.  
               - Demolish RCRA empty containers.
               - Overpack several drums. 
               - Continue air monitoring in the work zone and the perimeter of the Site.
               - Evaluate disposal options based upon waste volumes, containers, hazard categorization results
                    and Site logistics. 

2.2.2 Issues

The main health and safety issues during the period at the Site are potentially harmful emissions of hydrogen cyanide and acid spills.  The issues is addressed through engineering controls and good work practices.  In addition,  all workers briefed everyday to make sure everyone stays vigilant and safe.  OSC and START are closely monitoring all areas, especially piles of solids and liquids to ensure no unsafe emissions or acid spills are occuring.

  2.3 Logistics Section
    NA

  2.4 Finance Section
    No information available at this time.

  2.5 Other Command Staff
    2.5.1 Safety Officer

The Health and Safety Plan was approved and signed by all site personnel.  Safety meetings are held daily.  HASP is currently under review for amendment.

2.5.2 Liaison Officer
NA

2.5.3 Information Officer: N/A
Community Involvement Coordinator: Ginny Narsete

3. Participating Entities
  3.1 Unified Command
NA

3.2 Cooperating Agencies

IDEM

City of Mishawaka

St. Joseph County Health Department

Mishawaka Fire Department


4. Personnel On Site
 

The following numbers of personnel were on-Site during the reporting period:

  
Organization Position # Personnel
EPA OSC 1
ERRS Response Manager 1
  Foreman 1
  Field Chemist 1
  Laborer 5
  Field Cost Accountant 1
Weston START 1


5. Definition of Terms
 

Baycote            Baycote Metal Finishing Site

CERCLA           Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act
CRZ                  Contamination Reduction Zone

EPA                 Environmental Protection Agency

ERRS               Emergency and Rapid Response Services
D.O.T.              Department of Transportation

FCA                 Field Cost Accountant

HASP               Health and Safety Plan

HAZCAT Hazardous Categorization 
IDEM                Indiana Department of Environmental Management

NA                    Not Applicable

OSC                 On-Scene Coordinator

PolRep              Pollution Report

RCRA                Resource Conservation and Recovery Act

PRP                  Potentially Responsible Party

RM                    Response Manager

START              Superfund Technical Assessment and Response Team

6. Additional sources of information
  6.1 Internet location of additional information/report

www.epaosc.org/BaycoteMetalFinishing

6.2 Reporting Schedule

PolReps will be submitted on a weekly or bi-weekly basis.


7. Situational Reference Materials
  No information available at this time.


Click here to view Attached Images