2.1.1 Narrative
2.1.2 Response Actions to Date
2.1.2.a The following removal actions have been undertaken by the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (ODEQ) in the past:
2000 – Removal Action
Based on the findings of the 2000 HC RA, HC performed a removal action at the former mill site for ODEQ from 14 through 29 September 2000. The objective of this action was to provide prompt risk reduction by excavating soil exceeding 230 mg/kg mercury in the mill area, and for arsenic and lead the cleanup goals were 50 mg/kg and 400 mg/kg, respectively. Eight yd3 of soil were excavated from the mill furnace area, and this material was transported off-Site for disposal as hazardous waste. Approximately 240 yd3 of mercury-contaminated soil was excavated from the mill area and placed in a lined and covered temporary storage cell near the base of the waste rock pile. This material was removed from the Site in April 2004 and transported off-Site for disposal. Larger debris such as concrete, firebrick, and a metal furnace were placed in a subsurface vault located at the former mill site. Disturbed areas were restored, as closely as possible, to the original site conditions.
Confirmation soil samples were collected after the removal action. A few samples exceeded the mercury cleanup goal (up to 6,400 mg/kg); however, these sample areas are beneath two to six feet of clean material. Characterization samples collected from the surrounding hillside, calcine, waste rock pile, roads, driveways, and cell base had mercury concentrations ranging from 1.53 to 220 mg/kg. Four samples with greater than 230 mg/kg mercury were from the mine adit (306 mg/kg), the temporary repository (500 mg/kg), an area south of the former mill (930 mg/kg), and a small area where free mercury was observed (5,100 mg/kg).
2014 – Removal Action
NRC Environmental, with technical support and documentation from APEX, performed a second removal action at the Site for ODEQ in February 2014. The objective of this action was to achieve prompt human health risk reduction by removing and capping soil in certain inhabited areas of the Site that were impacted by elevated concentrations of mercury and arsenic. At the time this removal action was performed, the contaminants of concern were mercury and arsenic, and the cleanup goals were 23 mg/kg and 17 mg/kg, respectively.
Prior to implementation of the removal action, FPXRF screening was performed at 118 points scattered across the Site. Arsenic ranged from non-detect to 471 parts per million (ppm), and mercury concentrations ranged from non-detect to 1,200 ppm. Using this information, six areas were identified that had arsenic or mercury concentrations above the cleanup goals. During conduct of the removal action (12 through 21 February 2014) and follow-up site visit (12 March 2014), 39 additional data points were collected from across the Site with the purpose of better understanding the metals distribution across the Site. Arsenic concentrations in these points ranged from non-detect to 81 ppm, and mercury concentrations ranged from non-detect to 459 ppm. The results indicated that the mine-waste contamination from the mill site area is more widespread than previously anticipated, including contamination encountered near two existing home sites.
The largest areas of contaminated soil encompass about 16 acres, including the original mill site and calcine pile. ODEQ determined that these areas could not be excavated at this time due to resource constraints. Temporary fencing and gates were installed to restrict access to certain areas and the existing blackberry vegetation restricting access to Area 4 was left undisturbed. Approximately 60 yd3 of contaminated soil and firebrick were excavated from the smaller areas, and this material was placed in a temporary cell near the base of the waste rock pile where it remains. Disturbed areas were restored, as closely as possible, to the original site conditions.
2.1.2.b. The following removal actions have been undertaken by EPA as part of this ongoing removal action for the current reporting period:
Excavation and Reconstruction
ERRS continued to excavate drainage channels in Area 1 and Area 2 along with
the anchor trench around the toe of the repository.
ERRS placed 40 bags of powdered bentonite at Residence 6 to
fill void space between large cobbles that were previously identified as
pathways for mercury vapors. The void space was backfilled using clay excavated
from the anchor trench in Area 1. A layer of 6 inch sub-base was then placed
throughout Residence 6 to level the area on October 11.
On October 8, ERRS placed topsoil around the trees at
Residence 1. Soil from the anchor trench in Area 1 was used to level the south
section, and shale rock from Residence 2 was used to level the north section. An
additional layer of 2.5 inch minus rock imported from Umpqua Quarry was then
placed throughout Residence 1.
During previous reporting periods, approximately 5,200 yd3
of mine-waste contaminated material was excavated at the mill site. During
the current reporting period, the mill site was backfilled with 4,600 yd3 of
soil excavated from Residence 2 and smaller quantities of jaw rock and
excavated soil in Area 1 and Area 2. The mill site was then covered with a thin
layer of topsoil and seeded.
Erosion Control Measures
ERRS placed weed-free seed and straw along the eastern section of Area 1 to
promote revegetation of the hillside. The drainage ditches in Area 1, Area 2,
and Area 4 were lined with gabion rock for erosion control.
Vehicle and Equipment Decontamination and Screening
On October 2, the 336 CAT excavator was decontaminated and screened with the Lumex
mercury vapor analyzer in accordance with the protocol developed during the
previous reporting period. Both cab filter and the engine filter were replaced.
This was the last piece of heavy equipment that required decontamination. Later
that day, the ERRS mercury vacuum was decontaminated and screened with the
Lumex. In general, the vacuum was less than 100 ng/m3 with the
exception of a few components that were consistently greater than 5,000 ng/m3;
these components were discarded in the repository and will be replaced upon
demobilization from the Site.
Homesite Placement and Utilities
ERRS continued to install water line and phone conduit to Residence 4 and
Residence 5. CenturyLink placed communication cable from the southwest corner
of Area 4 to near Residence 4. The mini-excavator began to install a utility
trench leading up the road near Area 2 toward Residence 1.
On September 29, OSC Liverman contacted START to request a
survey of the property boundary to assist with the positioning of the
replacement manufactured homes and identify potential borrow sources of clean
fill. START arranged for a surveyor to identify all corners of the property and
flag approximate 100 foot intervals along the northern and southern boundaries.
The survey was scheduled for October 11 – 14 during the following reporting
period.
On October 8, ODEQ was informed of EPA’s decision to place
the manufactured homes at Residence 1 and Residence 6. The decision was based
on an analysis of Site circumstances, including but not limited to the location
of the former mill, the volume of mine-waste contaminated material excavated
from and replaced with clean backfill at both locations (and elsewhere on Site),
ambient construction-related screening data using field instruments such as the
Lumex mercury vapor analyzer, and homeowner preference. OSC Heister discussed
this decision in greater detail on the following day when ODEQ Bryn Thoms and
two representatives from the Oregon Health Authority visited the Site.
Screening, Sampling and Laboratory Results
As mentioned during previous PolReps, the distribution and concentration of
mercury vapors on Site appears to be affected by multiple variables including
temperature, humidity, wind speed, wind direction, Site activities, and
proximity to the repository, among other factors. The hillside surrounding the
excavated areas, along with the footprints of Residences 1, 2 and 6 were also
considered potential sources of mercury vapors. In early October, START and OSC
Heister decided to assess the influence of the repository by performing Lumex
mercury vapor screening both before and after the repository was completely covered
with a 6 inch layer of clean compacted topsoil.
The results in draft Table 4 were collected when the
repository was only partially (25%) covered with compacted topsoil. All
concentrations were less than the ATSDR standard for the normal occupancy
recommendation in residential settings (1,000 ng/m3),
although the concentrations at some of the locations were within 20% of the
standard.
Draft Table 4: Repository
only partially covered on 10/4.
Location
|
Date
|
Time
|
Mercury Vapor (ng/m3)
|
Residence 1A
|
4-Oct-14
|
Morning
|
620
|
4-Oct-14
|
Noon
|
112
|
4-Oct-14
|
Afternoon
|
28
|
Residence 1B
|
4-Oct-14
|
Morning
|
91
|
4-Oct-14
|
Noon
|
54
|
4-Oct-14
|
Afternoon
|
13
|
Residence 1C
|
4-Oct-14
|
Morning
|
11
|
4-Oct-14
|
Noon
|
23
|
4-Oct-14
|
Afternoon
|
31
|
Residence 2A
|
4-Oct-14
|
Morning
|
267
|
4-Oct-14
|
Noon
|
210
|
4-Oct-14
|
Afternoon
|
164
|
Residence 2B
|
4-Oct-14
|
Morning
|
277
|
4-Oct-14
|
Noon
|
241
|
4-Oct-14
|
Afternoon
|
338
|
Residence 6A
|
4-Oct-14
|
Morning
|
54
|
4-Oct-14
|
Noon
|
208
|
4-Oct-14
|
Afternoon
|
27
|
Residence 6B
|
4-Oct-14
|
Morning
|
41
|
4-Oct-14
|
Noon
|
122
|
4-Oct-14
|
Afternoon
|
72
|
Mill Site
|
4-Oct-14
|
Morning
|
673
|
4-Oct-14
|
Noon
|
106
|
4-Oct-14
|
Afternoon
|
838
|
The results in draft Table 5 were collected after the
repository was completed covered with 6 inches of compacted topsoil. All
concentrations were well below the ATSDR standard for the normal occupancy
recommendation in residential settings (1,000 ng/m3),
notably the mill site which had elevated concentrations greater than 24,000 ng/m3 during previous reporting periods. Based
on the results from this limited screening event, it appears that the
repository was likely a significant source of mercury vapors during the 2014
removal action.
Draft Table 5: Repository
covered with 6 inches of soil by 10/7.
Location
|
Date
|
Time
|
Mercury Vapor (ng/m3)
|
Residence 1A
|
7-Oct-14
|
Afternoon
|
13
|
8-Oct-14
|
Morning
|
339
|
8-Oct-14
|
Mid-Morning
|
23
|
8-Oct-14
|
Noon
|
15
|
8-Oct-14
|
Afternoon
|
10
|
9-Oct-14
|
Morning
|
30
|
Residence 1B
|
7-Oct-14
|
Afternoon
|
3
|
8-Oct-14
|
Morning
|
432
|
8-Oct-14
|
Mid-Morning
|
18
|
8-Oct-14
|
Noon
|
60
|
8-Oct-14
|
Afternoon
|
20
|
9-Oct-14
|
Morning
|
98
|
Residence 1C
|
7-Oct-14
|
Afternoon
|
8
|
8-Oct-14
|
Morning
|
160
|
8-Oct-14
|
Mid-Morning
|
25
|
8-Oct-14
|
Noon
|
13
|
8-Oct-14
|
Afternoon
|
11
|
9-Oct-14
|
Morning
|
88
|
Residence 6A
|
7-Oct-14
|
Afternoon
|
5
|
8-Oct-14
|
Morning
|
81
|
8-Oct-14
|
Mid-Morning
|
41
|
8-Oct-14
|
Noon
|
28
|
8-Oct-14
|
Afternoon
|
20
|
9-Oct-14
|
Morning
|
112
|
Residence 6B
|
7-Oct-14
|
Afternoon
|
60
|
8-Oct-14
|
Morning
|
83
|
8-Oct-14
|
Mid-Morning
|
46
|
8-Oct-14
|
Noon
|
10
|
8-Oct-14
|
Afternoon
|
27
|
9-Oct-14
|
Morning
|
189
|
Mill Site
|
7-Oct-14
|
Afternoon
|
120
|
8-Oct-14
|
Morning
|
247
|
8-Oct-14
|
Mid-Morning
|
NA
|
8-Oct-14
|
Noon
|
NA
|
8-Oct-14
|
Afternoon
|
NA
|
9-Oct-14
|
Morning
|
167
|
Repository
During the current reporting period, ERRS continued to perform compaction of
the repository using a vibratory compactor, bulldozers and haul trucks. The
repository was expanded toward the south to overlay pre-existing calcine piles
and to accommodate the greater volume of mine-waste contaminated material. The
compaction of the mine-waste contaminated material at the repository was
completed on September 29. ERRS began to place unscreened topsoil on the
repository on October 3. The topsoil was compacted to a depth of approximately
6 inches using the bulldozer and by October 7 the entire repository had been
covered with topsoil. On October 10, ERRS removed windrows, sharp sticks and
rocks from the compacted topsoil and smoothed the edges of the repository using
the mini-excavator in preparation for deploying the liners during the following
reporting period.
Twelve rolls of 40-millimeter (mil) low-density polyethylene
(LDPE) were delivered on October 7 and staged in Area 1; each roll is 16,300 ft2.
This liner will be in direct contact with the compacted topsoil. A second liner
composed of 200-mil geotextile composite will be delivered during the next
reporting period. Ultimately, the geotextile composite will be placed above the
LDPE liner and underneath a soil cap to create a pathway for infiltrated
groundwater.
Best
Management Practices
Continued to monitor and measure Site conditions and maintain Site BMPs. Continued
to deploy the DataRam particulate monitors around the top of the repository,
the staging area, and Residence 3. Dust suppression efforts were effective, especially
as the daily temperatures decreased and relative humidity increased.
Off-Site Support
Activities
During the reporting period,
OSC Heister devoted considerable time to searching for two replacement trailers
throughout the Willamette Valley while OSC Liverman prepared a draft action
memorandum amendment and maintenance, monitoring, and repair (MM&R) plan.
OSC Liverman also coordinated with ODEQ and Douglas County staffs along with
SHPO, USFWS, and tribal staffs regarding final project documents.
2.1.3 Enforcement Activities, Identity of Potentially Responsible Parties (PRPs)
EPA has initiated a PRP search for this Site, and EPA will continue to collect and analyze additional information about mining companies involved with operations at the Site and/or owners of the Site.
2.1.4 Progress Metrics (as of 10/11/14)
Waste Stream |
Medium |
Quantity |
Manifest # |
Treatment |
Disposal |
Commingled mercury waste |
Soil
and other debris removed using hand tools
|
(2) 55-gallon drums |
- |
Macro-encapsulation |
RCRA Subtitle C Facility (TBD) |
Commingled mercury waste |
Soil and other debris removed using Hg recovery vacuum |
(1) 5-gallon pail |
- |
Retirement (sulfide treatment) |
TBD |
|