U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

HTTPS

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock () or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Welch Group Environmental (WGE) Fairplay

Notices

All Notices [1] rss feed
Categories
Notices  Posted Category
Removal Site Inspection Report 3/9/2011 START RSI Report

REMOVAL SITE INSPECTION

WELCH GROUP ENVIRONMENTAL (wge), fAIRPLAY SITE

FAIR PLAY, OCONEE County, SOUTH carolina

1.0     NTRODUCTION

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EIPA) tasked the Oneida Total Integrated Enterprises (OTIE) Superfund Technical Assessment and Response Team (START) to perform field activities in support of the On Scene Coordinator (OSC) for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) at the Welch Group Environmental (WGE) Fair Play Site, located in Fair Play, Oconee County, South Carolina.  The field activities include maintaining the EPA OSC site webpage (Fair Play Site), compiling site history and maps, and managing field data. The site activities are conducted under Contract Number (No.) EP-W-05-053 and Technical Direction Document (TDD) No. TNA-05-001-0126.  The general purpose of the RSI is to collect information to assist in determining whether Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) hazardous substances have been released into the environment.  Specifically, findings will identify the need for federal intervention under the CERCLA of 1980 and the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA) of 1986.   In addition, the EPA OSC expanded the scope of the above actions by directing the PRP to conduct an emergency response (Pol/Sitrep #1).  START expanded its role in support of this additional action.

Specifically, START was tasked with the following:

·         Prepare a Health and Safety Plan (START HASP);

·         Prepare a Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP)/Site Sampling Plan (START Sampling Plan) (SSP);

·         Screen surface and subsurface soil for lead concentrations using a Niton® X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) elemental detector;

·         Submit a limited number of soil samples to a laboratory for total lead analysis (Laboratory Report);

·         Document site activities with written logbook notes (START Fieldnotes), digital photographs (Photolog) and maintain the OSC webpage (Fair Play Site);

·         Prepare a comprehensive report summarizing the site conditions, field investigation activities, and analytical results of the RSI.

This RSE Report summarizes the existing conditions at the site; describes the field investigation activities conducted by START in February 2011; and, delineates the limits, nature, and extent of soil contamination at the site.  All activities and procedures described in this report were performed in accordance with the EPA Region 4 Field Branches Quality System and Technical Procedures (FBQSTP) (EPA Region 4 Technical Procedures).

2.0     SITE BACKGROUND

This section discusses the site characteristics, previous investigations, and environmental setting of the area.

2.1         SITE DESCRIPTION

The site is located in Fair Play, Oconee County, South Carolina.  The geographic coordinates are 34º 31′ 23.96″ North latitude and 82º 59′ 28.82″ West longitude (Figure 1).  The site is comprised of a one story house and a one story partially enclosed brick building (smelting operation).  The property is located on a hillside that is owned by Mr. James Feltman.  The Feltman property is located on a 22-acre parcel, and smelting operations were conducted on approximately 6 acres.

Topographically upgradient of the smelting building there are equipment, scrap metal, deteriorated cars, trucks, and tractors scattered on the property.  Downgradient of the smelting building there are several box trailers and multiple pallets of concrete blocks.                                                                                                                                                                                           
The site is bordered by State Road South 37 to the north, to the east by Highway 59, agricultural land to the west, and a wetland to the south (Figure 2).  Topographically, the site drains generally to the northeast. 

The property is owned by Mr. Feltman and leased to Mr. Glenn Welch of WGE.  WGE operations at this site involved the smelting and molding of lead recovered from both indoor and outdoor shooting ranges across the United States.

2.2         PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS

The South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (SCDHEC) conducted an initial site inspection on November 3, 2010.  Details of the SCDHEC report can be found on the OSC web page at the following link (SCDHEC Memo). 

The site was referred to the EPA on December 22, 2010 by the South Carolina Bureau of Land and Waste Management.  Details of the SCDHEC referral letter can be found on the OSC web page (SCDHEC Referral).

On January 31, 2011, the EPA On-Scene Coordinator (OSC), SC DHEC, START, the property owner (James Feltman), and WGE (Glenn Welch) conducted a removal site inspection.  According to Mr. Welch, WGE has been operating at this location for approximately 14 months.  After material separation at the WGE Anderson facility, the WGE Fair Play facility was used for smelting and molding of lead.  The photographic log (Photolog) and field logbook notes (START Fieldnotes).

3.0     FIELD INVESTIGATION ACTIVITIES

 On February 1 and 3, 2011, START performed a preliminary RSE that included surface soil screening, soil sampling, and analysis activities at the site to identify the nature and extent of lead contamination in on-site soils from site operations.  START utilized an XRF instrument to screen on-site soils for lead contamination to a maximum depth of 6 inches below ground surface (bgs).  The EPA OSC indicated that soil samples were only to be collected from 0 to 6 inches bgs. 

START collected a total of 75 discrete surface soil samples from 15 grids using stainless steel spoons for screening using the XRF.  These discrete soil samples were collected topographically downgradient from the smelting building.  Additionally, START collected a total of 140 discrete surface soil samples from 28 grids using stainless steel spoons for screening using the XRF.  These discrete soil samples were collected topographically upgradient from the smelting building.   One sample of the surface material was collected from the concrete floor of the smelting building. 

In addition to the samples collected for XRF screening, composite samples were collected of the screened soils and submitted for laboratory analysis.  These composite samples collected for laboratory analysis were from the downgradient portion of the site.  A total of 11 soil composite samples and one duplicate were submitted to Gulf Coast Analytical Laboratories (GCAL) for analysis of total lead in accordance with SW846 Method 6010C, and five soil composite samples and one duplicate were submitted to GCAL for analysis of Target Analyte List (TAL) Metals in accordance with SW846 Method 6010C/7471B.   The sample of the surface material that was collected from the concrete floor of the smelting building was submitted for total lead and TAL metals analysis.  The data gathered during the RSI will be used to determine the release or substantial threat of release of a CERCLA hazardous substance.

Geographic positioning information was collected for all sampling locations and was geographically referenced using ArcView and uploaded to a hand-held Trimble® Global Positioning System (GPS).  (Table 1) and (Table 1a) presents the GPS coordinates for each sample location.

3.1         SURFACE SOIL SCREENING

On February 1 and 3, 2011, START collected surface soil samples for screening purposes.  The site was subdivided into 50 foot (ft) x 50 ft sampling grids.  Based on the site topography and drainage pattern, the EPA OSC directed START to grid areas along the drainage patterns.  Five-point discrete surface soil samples (0 to 6 inches) were collected from each grid location and screened using the XRF.  Each sample was collected using stainless steel spoons, placed in zip top bags, and screened using the XRF.  The lead results detected on the XRF were compared to the Region 4 Regional Screening Level (RSL) for residential soil of 400 parts per million (ppm).  Screening results for each sample location are found on (Figure 3) and are summarized on (Table 1).

Additionally on February 8, 2011, the EPA directed START to screen the surface soils upgradient of the smelter building.  START collected a total of 140 discrete surface soil samples from 28 grids using stainless steel spoons for screening using the XRF.  The samples were only collected for screening purposes.  A summary of the XRF soil screening results are presented on (Table 1a) and the screening results for each sample location is found on (Figure 3).  

3.2         OSC REQUIRED EMERGENCY RESPONSE (ER) ACTIONS

On January 31, 2011, the EPA discussed with WGE the ER actions required to the secure the site (WGE Workplan).  The EPA OSC directed WGE to immediately complete the following site tasks (WGE Progress Report):

1)      Install silt fencing to limit the further impact of potentially impacted surface water off-site;

2)      Secure and/or overpack all open containers with lead related material in the smelting building pending disposal/recycling;

3)      Secure site with security tape until removal activities.

3.3         XRF SCREENING OF CONCRETE BLOCKS, EQUIPMENT, AND USED VEHICLES

On February 1, 3, 8, and 9, 2011, the EPA OSC tasked START to screen the pallets of concrete blocks, equipment, and used vehicles located at the site.  On February 1 and 3, 2011, START screened the pallets of concrete blocks that were located downgradient of the smelting building.  The results from the XRF screening indicated approximately 45% of the items screened were impacted with lead concentrations greater than the Region 4 RSL for residential soil of 400 ppm.    

On February 3, 8, and 9, 2011, START screened the equipment and used vehicles upgradient of the smelting building.  The XRF results indicated lead impacts, possibly from site operations, above the Region 4 RSL for residential soil of 400 ppm.  A summary of the XRF readings and grid locations is presented in (Table 2).  (Figure 4) shows the grid location and associated XRF readings.  

On February 17, 2011, the EPA OSC directed START to collect representative paint samples from two old vehicles staged on the upgradient portion of the property in order to gain a representation of the vehicles upgradient of the smelting building.  The samples were submitted to GCAL for laboratory analysis of lead.  A summary of the analytical results is included on (Table 3).  The laboratory report (Laboratory Report) can be viewed at the following link.

3.4         SURFACE SOIL SAMPLING 

A composite sample from each of the 15 grids was submitted for laboratory analysis.  The five discrete samples that were collected and screened using the XRF from each of the 15 grids were homogenized in stainless steel bowls, containerized, placed on ice, documented, and shipped under standard chain-of-custody procedures to GCAL in Baton Rouge, Louisiana.  The soil samples were compared to the Region 4 Regional Screening Level (RSL) for residential soil of 400 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg).  A summary of the laboratory analytical results for each sample collected are found in (Table 3).  (Figure 5) depicts the areas of lead impacts to the surface soils.

3.5         SITE SECURITY AND MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS

During the site inspection, shell casings and bullet remains were discovered in the natural drainage patterns at the site.  As a result, the EPA OSC instructed WGE to install silt fencing to limit the further impact of potentially impacted surface water off-site.  The photographic log (Photolog) can be viewed at the following link.

During the RSE, drums of varying contents were observed on site.  The EPA OSC instructed WGE to overpack deteriorated drums.  WGE was also told by the EPA OSC that all drums shall be stored and secured in the former smelting building for characterization and future disposal/recycling. There were a total of 41 drums of contaminated material, and an additional 11 drums and 10 buckets of unknown material for hazardous categorization, 2 steel boxes of lead material, and 1 drum of trash (WGE Progress Report).

On February 9, 2011, WGE obtained samples of material from each of the 11 drums and 10 buckets for hazardous characterization (HazCat) testing to determine material classification.  The results of the HazCat performed by WGE can be found at the following link (Fair Play Site).

4.0      QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL

QA/QC data are necessary to determine precision and accuracy and to demonstrate the absence of interferences and/or contamination of sampling equipment, glassware, and reagents.  This section describes the QA/QC measures taken and provides an evaluation of the usability of data presented in this report.

A total of one duplicate (AA10-100) for total lead and one duplicate (AA9-101) for TAL metals were submitted to GCAL for analysis.  The native sample (FP01-AA10) and its duplicate (AA10-100) had a high percent difference between the two samples (67%) for lead.  This difference can be attributed to the heterogeneity of the soil.  The native sample (FP06-AA9) and its duplicate (AA9-101) had a high percent difference between the two samples (90%) for copper (111%) and zinc (118%).  This difference can be attributed to the heterogeneity of the soil (Soil Laboratory Report).  

5.0     SITE INVESTIGATION RESULTS

The following sections summarize the XRF and laboratory results for soil samples collected during the RSE field sampling activities. 

As discussed, above START collected a total of 75 discrete surface soil samples from 15 grids.  XRF screening results indicate concentrations of lead were detected in all 15 Grids located downgradient of the smelting building.  Additionally, START collected a total of 140 discrete surface soil samples from 28 grids topographically upgradient from the smelting building.   The screening results for each sample location are summarized in (Table 1) and (Table 1a) and are shown on (Figure 3). 

11 composite samples from 11 grids were submitted for laboratory analysis.  The laboratory data indicated that 10 grids indicated soil lead concentrations results above the residential RSL of 400 mg/kg.  Only one sample, Grid AE10, indicated soil concentrations below the RSL (Soil Laboratory Report).   

Additionally, START screened pallets of concrete blocks, equipment, and used vehicles located at the site.  Initial indications are that items on site were impacted with lead, possibly from smelting operations.  Results of the screening are presented on (Table 2).  (Figure 4) shows the grid locations and associated XRF readings.

6.0     SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

The WGE Fair Play facility was used for smelting and molding of lead and other metals from spent munitions at firing ranges gathered from around the Southeast.  WGE leases the property from Mr. James Feltman.

WGE was directed by the EPA OSC to submit workplans that were approved for securing the facility.  WGE installed silt fencing to limit the amount of potentially impacted surface water leaving the site.  Based on the XRF results, the warehouse was limited to activity.  Drums and over packed containers of exposed lead and materials that exists on site were moved and secured in the former smelting building for further disposal/recycling.  On February 17th, the EPA OSC requested that WGE prepare the following plans for the WGE Fair Play facility:

  • Waste Characterization Plan (re. sampling) in order to gather the necessary information for an eventual Disposal/Recycling Options Analysis.
  • Decontamination/Demolition Plan for remaining debris and structures exceeding the lead cleanup criteria.
  • Soils Removal and Disposal Plan for soils exceeding the cleanup criteria.

Further activities associated with this site will be determined be based on the approval of the workplans listed above by the EPA OSC.  The EPA OSC anticipates that the management of the site will transition into a time critical removal action under an EPA Administrative Order on Consent.