U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
POLLUTION/SITUATION REPORT
DULHS Site - Removal Polrep
Final Removal Polrep

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region V
|
|
Subject:
|
POLREP #2
Final Polrep
DULHS Site
C53U
Detroit, MI
Latitude: 42.3540470 Longitude: -83.1998870
|
|
To:
|
Mark Johnson, ATSDR
Dan Wyant, MDEQ
Bill Schuette, Michigan Department of Attorney General
Valencia Darby, U.S. DOI
Carolyn Bohlen, U.S. EPA
Sam Borries, U.S. EPA
Yolanda Bouchee-Cureton, U.S. EPA
Mark Durno, U.S. EPA
Jason El-Zein, U.S. EPA
HQ EOC, U.S. EPA
John Glover, U.S. EPA
Matt Mankowski, U.S. EPA
Jennifer Manville, U.S. EPA
Cecilia Moore, U.S. EPA
Carol Ropski, U.S. EPA
Brian Schlieger, U.S. EPA
Ray Scott, Environmental Affairs
|
|
From:
|
Jeffrey Kimble, OSC
|
|
Date:
|
8/25/2016
|
|
Reporting Period:
|
08/01/2015-12/07/2015
|
|
1. Introduction
|
|
|
1.1 Background
|
|
|
|
|
Site Number: |
C53U |
|
Contract Number: |
|
|
D.O. Number: |
|
|
Action Memo Date: |
6/12/2015 |
|
Response Authority: |
CERCLA |
|
Response Type: |
Time-Critical |
|
Response Lead: |
EPA |
|
Incident Category: |
Removal Action |
|
NPL Status: |
Non NPL |
|
Operable Unit: |
|
|
Mobilization Date: |
9/13/2015 |
|
Start Date: |
9/13/2015 |
|
Demob Date: |
10/20/2015 |
|
Completion Date: |
12/7/2015 |
|
CERCLIS ID: |
|
|
RCRIS ID: |
|
|
ERNS No.: |
|
|
State Notification: |
12/7/2015 |
|
FPN#: |
|
|
Reimbursable Account #: |
|
1.1.1 Incident Category
Time critical removal action.
1.1.2 Site Description
The site consists of a former high school building located at 8181 Greenfield, Detroit, Wayne County, Michigan 48228 and surrounding property; Latitude: 42.353201 ° N, Longitude: -83.196917 ° W.
The immediate area is mixed industrial and commercial, with residential areas adjacent to the school as well.
1.1.2.1 Location
See above.
1.1.2.2 Description of Threat
Over 600 small containers of laboratory grade chemicals were abandoned in the building, most likely when the school ceased operation. These chemicals were found to be of various types including many labeled as poison. Also identified were wastes that were characteristically hazardous for corrosivity and ignitability and/or potentially reactive. Although EPA secured the building, trespassers have since broken in again and set at least one fire inside the building.
1.1.3 Preliminary Removal Assessment/Removal Site Inspection Results
EPA utilized ERRS to secure the
property on August 9, 2014. On November 7, 2014, DFD request cleanup assistance
from EPA as they could not get the owner to conduct the actions and DFD does
not have the means to conduct the cleanup.
The response action taken temporarily mitigated threats by conducting site board up. Due to a lack of clear ownership, EPA has used enforcement procedures to contact property owners and secure access to further assess and clean up the site.
|
|
2. Current Activities
|
|
|
2.1 Operations Section
|
|
|
|
2.1.1 Narrative
After a large degree of negotiation and tracking down potential responsible parties, EPA finally obtained signed access from the listed current owner. EPA used this access to initiate a removal action as no viable assets were discovered to date that could fund the cleanup.
EPA determined that the chemicals continued to pose a threat of release and although protective measures such as board up had been taken, trespassing and vandalism continue to occur on site. Removal of these chemicals, via lab-packing and off site disposition, is warranted.
Subsequent to the initial actions, the property was sold again (without notification to EPA) and cleaned out.
2.1.2 Response Actions to Date
From July 13 to 21, 2015, EPA mobilized contractors to site to initiate the cleanup and stabilized the site.
From July 22, 2015 through October 10, 2015, EPAs contractor obtained bids for disposal and awarded those bids.
On October 20, 2015, EPA and its contractors returned to site to complete disposal activities. Upon return, it was discovered that some unknown entity had initiated a cleanout of the premises and the waste containers were gone.
After investigating the issue, EPA determined a new "owner" had hired contractors to cleanout the building.
2.1.3 Enforcement Activities, Identity of Potentially Responsible Parties (PRPs)
The owner and companies doing the cleanout have asked for information on the disposal of the waste.
Enforcement is ongoing. To date, no adequate response to where the waste went has been received.
2.1.4 Progress Metrics
| Waste Stream |
Medium |
Quantity |
Manifest # |
Treatment |
Disposal |
| All waste missing |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| Regional Metrics |
|
| This is an Integrated River Assessment. The numbers should
overlap. |
Miles
of river systems cleaned and/or restored |
N/A |
|
| Cubic yards of contaminated sediments removed
and/or capped |
N/A |
|
| Gallons of oil/water recovered |
N/A |
|
| Acres of soil/sediment cleaned up in
floodplains and riverbanks |
N/A |
|
| Stand Alone Assessment |
Number
of contaminated residential yards cleaned up |
N/A |
|
| Number of workers on site |
5 |
|
| Contaminant(s)
of Concern |
|
|
| Oil
Response Tracking |
|
| Estimated volume |
Initial
amount released |
N/A |
|
| Final amount collected |
N/A |
|
| CANAPS Info |
FPN
Ceiling Amount |
N/A |
|
| FPN Number |
N/A |
|
| Body of Water affected |
N/A |
|
| Administrative
and Logistical Factors (Place X where applicable) |
|
| |
Precedent-Setting HQ
Consultations (e.g., fracking, asbestos) |
|
Community challenges or high
involvement |
|
Radiological |
|
| |
More than one
PRP x |
|
Endangered
Species Act / Essential Fish Habitat issues |
|
Explosives |
|
| |
AOC |
|
Historic
preservation issues |
|
Residential
impacts |
|
| |
UAO |
|
NPL site |
|
Relocation |
|
| |
DOJ involved |
|
Remote location |
|
Drinking water
impacted |
|
| |
Criminal
Investigation Division involved x |
|
Extreme weather
or abnormal field season |
|
Environmental
justice x |
|
| |
Tribal
consultation or coordination or other issues |
|
Congressional
involvement |
|
High media
interest |
|
| |
Statutory
Exemption for $2 Million |
|
Statutory
Exemption for 1 Year |
|
Active fire
present |
|
| |
Hazmat Entry
Conducted – Level A, B or C x |
|
Incident or
Unified Command established |
|
Actual air
release (not threatened) |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Green
Metrics |
|
| |
Metric |
|
Amount |
|
Units |
|
| |
Diesel Fuel Used |
|
200 (est) |
gallons |
|
| |
Unleaded Fuel Used |
|
200 (est) |
|
gallons |
|
| |
Alternative/E-85 Fuel Used |
|
40 |
gallons |
|
| |
Electricity from Coal |
|
N/A |
kW |
|
| |
Electricity from solar/wind |
|
N/A |
kW |
|
| |
Electricity from grid/mix |
|
N/A |
kW |
|
| |
Solid waste used |
|
N/A |
|
|
| |
Solid waste recycled |
|
N/A |
|
|
| Version
140908 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.2 Planning Section
|
|
|
|
2.2.1 Anticipated Activities
None. Site will be closed.
2.2.1.1 Planned Response Activities
No further action.
2.2.1.2 Next Steps
None.
2.2.2 Issues
On December 7th, 2015, the Site was referred by EPA to State of Michigan for additional follow up for potential disposal illegal activities.
EPA kept the site open in case additional information was obtained and proper disposal could have occurred. Since this didn't happen, the site will be closed.
|
|
|
2.3 Logistics Section
|
|
|
|
No information available at this time.
|
|
|
2.4 Finance Section
|
|
|
|
No information available at this time.
|
|
|
2.5 Other Command Staff
|
|
|
|
2.5.1 Safety Officer
OSC
2.5.2 Liaison Officer
OSC
2.5.3 Information Officer
OSC
|
|
3. Participating Entities
|
|
|
3.2 Cooperating Agencies
Detroit Fire Department
|
|
4. Personnel On Site
|
|
|
4 ERRS
1 OSC
|
|
5. Definition of Terms
|
|
|
ERRS = Emergency and Rapid Response Service contractor
EPA = Environmental Protection Agency
OSC = On Scene Coordinator
|
|
6. Additional sources of information
|
|
|
6.1 Internet location of additional information/report
NA
6.2 Reporting Schedule
Done.
|
|
7. Situational Reference Materials
|
|
|
No information available at this time.
|
|
|