U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
POLLUTION/SITUATION REPORT
McCarthy Road Discharge - Polrep/Sitrep
Initial and Final Polrep/Sitrep

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region X
|
Subject:
|
SITREP #1
Initial/Final
McCarthy Road Discharge
McCarthy, AK
Latitude: 61.3720000 Longitude: -142.7970000
|
To:
|
Robert Whittier, Alaska Operations
Chris Field, EPA Region 10 (POLREP List)
Jeffrey Fowlow, EPA Region 10 (POLREP List)
Richard Franklin, EPA Region 10 (PolRep List)
Dan Heister, EPA Region 10 (POLREP List)
Nick Knowles, EPA Region 10 (POLREP List)
Earl Liverman, EPA Region 10 (POLREP List)
Wally Moon, EPA Region 10 (POLREP List)
Kathy Parker, EPA Region 10 (POLREP List)
David Rees, EPA Region 10 (POLREP List)
Jeffry Rodin, EPA Region 10 (POLREP List)
Michael Sibley, EPA Region 10 (POLREP List)
Calvin Terada, EPA Region 10 (POLREP List)
Greg Weigel, EPA Region 10 (POLREP List)
Angie Zavala, EPA Region 10 (POLREP LIST)
Greg Buie, NPFC (POLREP List)
John Engles, ADEC
Steve Russell, ADEC
Tami Fordham, Deputy AOO
Dale Becker, EPA Region 10 (POLREP List)
Michael Boykin, EPA Region 10 (POLREP List)
Matthew Carr, EPA Region 10 (POLREP List)
Kate Spaulding, OCE
Phil Johnson, DOI
|
Thru:
|
|
From:
|
Robert Whittier, OSC
|
Date:
|
5/22/2015
|
Reporting Period:
|
04/29/2015-05/22/2015
|
Executive Summary
|
|
On April 29th both the “National Park Service” and “Alaska Department of Conservation” personnel requested EPA assistance in dealing with unreported discharges associated with a placer mine operator located approximately 17 miles east of McCarthy, AK near the Nizina River. One incident that occurred over the winter involved the overturning of a 1500 gallon skid tank discharging approximately 1000 gallons of diesel fuel on an unimproved trail upslope from the river. The other involved discharges of hydraulic fluid from staged excavation equipment along the shoreline of the Nizina River. Given the threat of impact to the river from the former incident, and evidence of impact from the staging of equipment, a field assessment was warranted.
|
1. Introduction
|
|
1.1 Background
|
|
|
Site Number: |
|
|
Contract Number: |
|
D.O. Number: |
|
|
Action Memo Date: |
|
Response Authority: |
OPA |
|
Response Type: |
Time-Critical |
Response Lead: |
|
|
Incident Category: |
Removal Assessment |
NPL Status: |
|
|
Operable Unit: |
|
Mobilization Date: |
|
|
Start Date: |
5/20/2015 |
Demob Date: |
|
|
Completion Date: |
5/21/2015 |
CERCLIS ID: |
|
|
RCRIS ID: |
|
ERNS No.: |
|
|
State Notification: |
|
1.1.1 Incident Category
The National Park Service and the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation requested EPA assistance in assessing a 1000 gallon discharge of diesel fuel from an overturned skid tank possibly threatening the Nizina River. It was also requested that a second site be investigated involving leaking excavation equipment staged along the same river in a different location.
1.1.2 Site Description
The first incident involving the skid tank occurred on an Alaska DOT right of way, and also impacted land owned by the University of Alaska. The second situation involving leaking equipment took place below the high water mark on Alaska Department of Natural Resources land.
1.1.2.1 Location
Both Sites are located approximately 17 miles east of McCarthy, AK in a rugged remote area surrounded by Wrangell St. Elias Park and Preserve.
1.1.2.2 Description of Threat
The primary threat involves the discharge of the estimated 1000 gallons of diesel fuel located upslope from the Nizina River.
1.1.3 Preliminary Removal Assessment/Removal Site Inspection Results
An on-site investigation with the NPS and ADEC determined that the 1000 gallon discharge posed no threat to the Nizina River given the relatively long distance to the river, soil conditions, and the presence of thick herbaceous vegetation. The second site involving the hydraulic fluid leakage from the staged excavation equipment shown little evidence of remaining fluids. It's speculated that the shoreline was scoured during flooding associated with spring breakup.
|
|
1.2 Incident Objectives
|
|
|
Assessment only
|
|
1.3 Critical Resource Needs
|
|
|
None
|
|
1.4 Strategic Considerations
|
|
|
None
|
2. Current Activities
|
|
2.1 Operations Section
|
|
|
2.1.1 Narrative
On May 20th personnel from the National Park Service and Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation staff, along with EPA met in McCarthy to investigate the two discharge sites in question, since road conditions improved enough to gain access. Investigation of the first site where the skid tank overturned during the winter season shown that its location did not threatened any waters of the US; (Nizina River). It was initially speculated during the review of satellite imagery, that channeled terrain would have aided the fuel reaching the river. Upon inspecting the site however, no channeled terrain was evident. The fuel spread out during the melting of ice and snow and was absorbed by soil and thick herbaceous vegetation leaving an extremely low probability of reaching “Navigable waters”; especially given a relatively long distance to the river.
Upon inspection of the second site on the bank of the river, where leaking construction equipment was first observed by NPS officials, shown little evidence of discharge. Given the time waiting for trail conditions to improve in order to gain access, it is believed that flooding during spring “break up” scoured the area removing any trace of contaminated shoreline. No further action, with the exception of monitoring the activities of the placer miner, is expected.
2.1.2 Response Actions to Date
Assessment only
2.1.3 Enforcement Activities, Identity of Potentially Responsible Parties (PRPs)
The case will be referred to the Office of Compliance and Enforcement for "failure to report", and possibly CWA violation. This refers to only the incident involving the leaking equipment staged at the river's edge.
2.1.4 Progress Metrics
Waste Stream |
Medium |
Quantity |
Manifest # |
Treatment |
Disposal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.2 Planning Section
|
|
|
2.2.1 Anticipated Activities
None
2.2.1.1 Planned Response Activities
None
2.2.1.2 Next Steps
None
2.2.2 Issues
A primary issue concerned the time waiting for adequate conditions in order to gain access to the Sites. The road was impassible from McCarthy due to frost coming out of the ground.
|
|
2.3 Logistics Section
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
2.4 Finance Section
|
|
|
No information available at this time.
|
|
2.5 Other Command Staff
|
|
|
2.5.1 Safety Officer
2.5.2 Liaison Officer
2.5.3 Information Officer
Not Applicable at this time
|
3. Participating Entities
|
|
3.1 Unified Command
EPA/ADEC
3.2 Cooperating Agencies
US National Park Service, University of Alaska, Alaska Department of Natural Resources
|
4. Personnel On Site
|
|
1- EPA
3- NPS
1-ADEC
|
5. Definition of Terms
|
|
N/A
|
6. Additional sources of information
|
|
6.1 Internet location of additional information/report
6.2 Reporting Schedule
N/A- Assessment only
|
7. Situational Reference Materials
|
|
Satellite Imagery
|
|
|