U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) continues to respond to an oil
discharge into Martins Creek, in the Borough of Bangor. Oil is entering the
creek from a storm sewer outfall, from a crack in the sewer on 8th
Street. The source of the spill is not presently known.
a Unified Command (UC) - a multi-agency team consisting of EPA, Pennsylvania
Department of Environmental Protection (PA DEP), Pennsylvania Fish and Boat
Commission, Northampton County Emergency Management, and Bangor Borough are
continuing to investigate the source of this release.
Site Cleanup Activities and Upcoming Work
Crews have secured the affected area of the creek with containment boom
and constructed an underflow dam where the storm sewer system discharges to the
creek. Over 2,000 gallons of oil have been recovered to date using a
vacuum truck and absorbent material.
EPA completed installation of an Aqua-Swirl™ oil/water separator (OWS) during the week of September 27 at the Bangor Oil Spill Site. The OWS went into effect immediately after installation and is filtering out oil from the storm water collection system. EPA will continue to monitor the amount of oil collected in the OWS through late December. There is a limited amount of sorbent boom in the creek, along with a 55-gallon drum on-site to contain any soiled boom or debris. It is important to note that the amount of oil collected is decreasing over time and there is no visible oil in the creek. The source investigation for the origin of the oil has been halted due to the lack of oil accumulation in the collection system.
If there is no significant oil accumulation throughout December, EPA will speak to the township to determine if the OWS should be bypassed or remain active. Should the need arise, the OWS can be easily reintroduced into the system if the township decides to bypass it at the end of the month.
For questions or concerns, please contact EPA On-Scene
Coordinator Ashley Nilsen at firstname.lastname@example.org
or EPA Community Involvement Coordinator Katie Page at email@example.com.
What Are the Risks at the Site?
The goal of EPA’s cleanup work at the site is to ensure that the potential risks for human health and the environment are addressed. It is important to note that residents in the affected area are connected to public drinking water.
The Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission has posted “fishing prohibited” signs in the area and taken fish tissue samples. The fish tissue samples were taken from Brown Trout and
American Eel from just
below the outfall, a few hundred meters below the outfall, and upstream of the
outfall. All samples results showed that there were no polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) detected in the fish tissue.
Below are some frequently asked questions related to
human health and environmental risks associated with the site. If you have
immediate concerns regarding potential risks at the site, please contact Dr. Karl Markiewicz, Senior Toxicologist from the Agency for Toxic
Substances and Disease Registry,
an arm of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- What are the factors that determine if there will be negative health impacts after being exposed to hazardous chemicals, such as fuel oils?
- How much exposure, how long of an exposure, the pathway of the exposure (breathing, eating, drinking, skin contact), any additional chemicals that were present in the exposure, and individual characteristics (age, sex, family traits, lifestyle, state of health) are all factors that determine whether harmful health effects will occur after exposure.
- Is my well water safe to drink?
- Most likely, yes. However, if you notice any changes in color, odor, or taste please contact EPA.
- If children swim in the creek, will they have a risk for cancer?
- No, we would not expect cancer to result from exposure to fuel oil while swimming in the creek. If there is sheen or strong vapors in the creek, we would not recommend swimming or playing the creek.
- Could there be negative health impacts from the fish people ate from the creek?
- It is unlikely that eating fish from
the creek would result in adverse health effects. Fish tissue samples from the
creek have been collected and the results will be reviewed from a public
- Are farm animals at risk of dying from drinking the water?
- It is unlikely that an animal would drink water that is highly contaminated with fuel oil.
Several fact sheets throughout 2021, along with EPA Press Releases, can be found in the "Resources" column of this webpage under "Documents" and "Notices," respectively.
For local news coverage at the site, please read:
"EPA still addressing fuel oil spilling from storm sewer into Martins Creek in Bangor for past 3 months, source of spill still unknown" published on July 8, 2021 by Andrew Scott of The Morning Call,
"Search for ongoing oil spill’s source continues in Bangor. EPA has plan to mitigate impact" published on August 24, 2021 by Steve Novak of the Lehigh Valley Live,
"Bangor creek oil leak has not harmed aquatic life, drinking water, authorities say" published on August 24, 2021 by Andrew Scott of the Morning Call.