U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

HTTPS

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock () or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Wrigley Charcoal Plant Site

All POL/SITREP's for this site Wrigley Charcoal Plant Site
Lyles, TN - EPA Region IV
POLREP #4
Final Polrep - Completion of Removal Action
Printer Friendly  |   PDF
 
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
POLLUTION/SITUATION REPORT
Wrigley Charcoal Plant Site - Removal Polrep
Final Removal Polrep

EPA Emergency Response

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region IV

Subject: POLREP #4
Final Polrep - Completion of Removal Action
Wrigley Charcoal Plant Site
04X6
Lyles, TN
Latitude: 35.9026562 Longitude: -87.3510982


To: James Webster, USEPA R4 ERRPB
Andy Binford, TDEC

From: Steve Spurlin, OSC
Date: 9/16/2015
Reporting Period: July 13, 2015 - September 4, 2015

1. Introduction
  1.1 Background
   
Site Number: 04X6    Contract Number: EPS40702
D.O. Number: 0124    Action Memo Date: 6/30/2015
Response Authority: CERCLA    Response Type: Time-Critical
Response Lead: EPA    Incident Category: Removal Action
NPL Status: NPL    Operable Unit:
Mobilization Date: 7/13/2015    Start Date: 7/13/2015
Demob Date: 9/4/2015    Completion Date: 9/4/2015
CERCLIS ID: TND980844781    RCRIS ID:
ERNS No.:    State Notification: 07/13/2015
FPN#:    Reimbursable Account #:

1.1.1 Incident Category

The Site is a fund lead time critical removal action to address threats posed by asbestos containing roof tiles.

1.1.2 Site Description

The Wrigley Charcoal Plant Site includes seven distinct areas affected by various industrial activities. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) placed the Site on the National Priorities List (NPL) in 1989 because of contaminated debris, ground water and soil resulting from facility operations dating back to the 1880's.

In 1995, Industrial Plastics Recycling started operating a small-scale recycling facility on the southern portion of the Site. Industrial Plastics Recycling conducted metals and plastics recycling, storage of waste products and other related activities on the southern portion of the Wrigley Charcoal Plant NPL Site. Industrial Plastics Recycling utilized approximately 15 acres of the NPL Site and consisted of a large warehouse, a large processing building and approximately five acres of outside/uncovered storage of processed and unprocessed acrylic, poly-carbonate, ABS, polyethylene, polypropylene, styrene, PVC and PETG plastics in totes and piles. The Site is surrounded by residential communities and directly adjacent to the North Fork of Mill Creek.

On December 18, 2013, the Industrial Plastics Recycling facility caught fire. Approximately five acres of plastics and surrounding buildings were involved and on fire. A large smoke plume ensued that extended for miles downwind. Numerous homes and business were impacted by the smoke plume. State and local officials implemented a 1½-mile evacuation zone in all directions.  The EPA responded under emergency authority and assisted with extinguishing the fire. The fire resulted in significant damage to the buildings and structures at the Site, and Industrial Plastics Recycling ceased operating at the Site.  For additional information regarding the Industrial Plastics incident, please visit the following website: http://epaosc.org/industrialplasticscofire
 

The fire, time, and weather events have impacted the roofing tiles on the old buildings.  The majority of the tiles have fallen onto the ground. Testing by TDEC and EPA verified the tiles contain asbestos.  A time critical removal action will be conducted by EPA to address the asbestos tiles and any soil areas impacted by the asbestos.

1.1.2.1 Location

The Site address is 8526 Plant Road, Lyles, Hickman County, Tennessee. The Site is located northwest of Highway 100, about 45 miles southwest of Nashville. The Site is surrounded by residential communities and directly adjacent to the North Fork of Mill Creek. 

1.1.2.2 Description of Threat

On April 20, 2015, the EPA and Tetra Tech collected 66 bulk samples from suspect asbestos-containing materials associated with the site buildings and site building debris. Analysis of the bulk samples indicated 10 of the 66 samples contained asbestos concentrations greater than one percent. The concentration of asbestos in the roof material ranged from 10 to 60 percent. On April 21, 2015, the EPA and Tetra Tech collected composite soil samples from 25 delineated surface soil areas outside of the building and structures. These samples were collected to determine if surface soils located further away from the building exterior walls contained asbestos. Five of the 25 samples contained concentrations of asbestos ranging from 0.30 to 0.60.

The disease and pathology associated with the inhalation of asbestos fibers is well documented in the medical literature. Congress has found that “medical science has established that no minimal exposure to asbestos fibers which is considered safe to exposed persons.” (20 U.S.C. § 3601(a)(3). If inhaled, asbestos fibers can increase the risk of developing lung cancer, mesothelioma, pleural fibrosis and asbestosis.

In addition to potential exposure to nearby residents, the EPA SRSEB plans to undertake extensive sampling and remedial action as part of the NPL process; therefore, human exposure is likely under current Site conditions. Site conditions are consistent with criteria outlined in the September 2008 EPA OSWER Directive 9200.0-68 “Framework for Investigating Asbestos-Contaminated Superfund Sites”, which supports a removal action when human exposure is likely. An action is warranted to prevent exposure to workers who will be operating at or near the area of contamination, future tenants and nearby residents.

1.1.3 Preliminary Removal Assessment/Removal Site Inspection Results

In December 2013, the TDEC Division of Air Pollution Control collected samples from the Site. Sample results verified that asbestos-containing material (chrysotile) was present at the Site.

On April 20, 2015, the EPA and Tetra Tech collected 66 bulk samples from suspect asbestos-containing materials associated with the site buildings and site building debris. Analysis of the bulk samples indicated 10 of the 66 samples contained asbestos concentrations greater than one percent. The concentration of asbestos in the roof material ranged from 10 to 60 percent. On April 21, 2015, the EPA and Tetra Tech collected composite soil samples from 25 delineated surface soil areas outside of the building and structures. These samples were collected to determine if surface soils located further away from the building exterior walls contained asbestos. Five of the 25 samples contained concentrations of asbestos ranging from 0.30 to 0.60 percent. 

2. Current Activities
  2.1 Operations Section
    2.1.1 Narrative

On July 13, 2015, EPA mobilized equipment and personnel to the Site to began a time critical removal action to address threats from asbestos roofing tiles.  The scope of the removal involved the physical removal of the tiles that remain attached to the roof, and the removal of tiles that have fallen inside and outside the buildings. 

2.1.2 Response Actions to Date

July 13 to July 25, 2015

·     The ERRS contractor conducted site preparation activities to include placing job trailers, removing and recycling  of scrap metal, installation of barrier marking work zone, and building of decontamination unit.

·         The ERRS contractor conducted removal activities to include the following:

o   Demolition of the small office located near the southeast corner of the north building.

o   Removal of asbestos-contaminated debris from inside and around the outside of the north building.

o   Removal of fire damaged equipment and metal from the inside and around the outside of the north building.

o   Water trucks were used for dust suppression during demolition and removal activities and to wash metal recovered for recycling.

·     Tetra Tech START conducted initial background and perimeter air sampling and soil sampling of two locations not sampled during the previous site assessment.

·     Background perimeter air sampling was conducted at one onsite location and at three residential locations prior to removal activities. 

·      Seven loads of metal were sent of site for recycling during this period.

·      Nine 20 cubic yard roll offs of asbestos-contaminated debris were transported from the site to a State of Tennessee approved asbestos landfill for disposal during this time period.

 

July 27 to August 1, 2015

·      The ERRS contractor conducted removal activities to include the following:

o   Conducted a surface soil scrape of the area north of the north building to stage brick demolition debris.

o   Conducted demolition of the north building.  Demolition debris was visually inspected by a State of Tennessee accredited asbestos project monitor.  Debris that appeared to be mixed with asbestos-containing roofing material was loaded into roll off boxes lined with two layers of 6-mil plastic sheeting for disposal at a State of Tennessee approved asbestos landfill.  Debris that did not appear to be mixed with asbestos-containing roofing material was staged in the area north of the north building.

o   Scraped and washed the concreted deck inside the north building prior to demolition of the north, northeast, and northwest brick walls to ensure the brick was not contaminated by asbestos debris and could be staged at the area north of the north building.

o   Conducted surface scraping of gross asbestos-contaminated debris inside the south building.

o   Removed, washed, staged, and recycled structural steel and other metal retrieved during demolition of the north building.

o   Water trucks were used for dust suppression during demolition, removal, and recycling activities.

·      The START contractor conducted area perimeter air sampling at one onsite location and at three residential locations during removal activities.  

·      Four loads of metal were sent off site for recycling.  To date, a total of 11 loads of metal have been recycled for a total of approximately 103 tons.

·      Seventeen 20 cubic yard roll offs of asbestos-contaminated debris were transported from the site to a State of Tennessee approved asbestos landfill for disposal during this time period.  To date, a total of 26, 20 cubic yard roll offs have been transported to the landfill for disposal.

 

August 3 to August 8, 2015

·      The ERRS contractor conducted removal activities to include the following:

o   Finished demolition of the north building.  Demolition debris was visually inspected by a State of Tennessee accredited asbestos project monitor.  Debris that appeared to be mixed with asbestos-containing roofing material was loaded into roll off boxes lined with two layers of 6-mil plastic sheeting for disposal at a State of Tennessee approved asbestos landfill.  Debris that did not appear to be mixed with asbestos-containing roofing material was staged in the area north of the north building.

o   Scraped and washed the concreted deck inside the north building prior to demolition of the south and southeast brick walls to ensure the brick was not contaminated by asbestos debris and could be staged at the area north of the north building.

o   Conducted surface scraping of gross asbestos-contaminated debris inside the south building.

o   Scraped and washed the concreted deck outside the south building prior to demolition of the north and northeast brick walls to ensure the brick was not contaminated by asbestos debris and could be staged at the area north of the north building.

o   Removal of asbestos containing roof shingles from the east roof of the south building.

o   Removed, washed, staged, and recycled structural steel and other metal retrieved during demolition of the north and south buildings.

o   Water trucks were used for dust suppression during demolition, removal, and recycling activities.

·      The START contractor conducted area perimeter air sampling at one onsite location and at three residential locations during removal activities.  Six loads of metal have been sent off site for recycling this week. Thirty-two 20 cubic yard roll offs of asbestos-contaminated debris were transported from the site to a State of Tennessee approved asbestos landfill for disposal during this time period.  To date, a total of 58, 20 cubic yard roll offs have been transported to the landfill for disposal.


August 10 to August 15, 2015

·         The ERRS contractor conducted removal activities to include the following:

o   Debris that appeared to be mixed with asbestos-containing roofing material was loaded into roll off boxes lined with two layers of 6-mil plastic sheeting for disposal at a State of Tennessee approved asbestos landfill.  Brick that did not appear to be mixed with asbestos-containing roofing material was staged in the area north of the north building or used to fill in the small ditch area outside the southeast side of the south building.

o   Conducted surface scraping of asbestos-contaminated debris inside the south building.

o   Scraped and washed the concreted deck outside the south building prior to demolition of the north brick wall to ensure the brick was not contaminated by asbestos debris and could be staged at the area north of the north building.

o   Removal of metal roof shingles from the east roof of the south building.

o   Scraped top layer of soil and washed the concreted deck outside the south building prior to demolition of the east/southeast brick wall to ensure the brick would not fall onto asbestos debris outside of the south building during demolition of the east/southeast wall.

o   Used clean brick from south and east/southeast walls of the south building to fill in the loading dock depression area outside the southeast side of the south building.

o   Demolished the west, northwest and southwest walls of the south building and loaded debris into roll off boxes lined with two layers of 6-mil plastic sheeting for disposal at a State of Tennessee approved asbestos landfill. 

o   Torched notches in the 2 rows of columns to weaken and aid the demolition of the entire frame.

o   Pulled down the entire frame of the south building using 2 excavators with cables attached.

o   Removed, washed, staged, and recycled structural steel and other metal retrieved during demolition of the south building.

o   A water truck was used for dust suppression during demolition, removal, and recycling activities.

·         The START contractor conducted area perimeter air sampling at one onsite location and at three residential locations during removal activities.   Five loads of metal have been sent off site for recycling this week. To date, a total of 20 loads of metal totalling approximately 168 tons have been shipped for recycle.

·      Twenty-two 20 cubic yard roll offs of asbestos-contaminated debris were transported from the site to a State of Tennessee approved asbestos landfill for disposal during this time period.  To date, a total of 81, 20 cubic yard roll offs have been transported to the landfill for disposal.
 

August 17, 2015 to August 22, 2015
  
  • The ERRS contractor conducted removal activities to include the following:
    • Removed, staged, loaded, and recycled structural steel from the frame of the south building.
    • Removed asbestos-contaminated debris from on and around the footprint of the south building.  The debris was staged for disposal.
    • Scraped asbestos-contaminated soil from identified areas south of the south building.
    • Conducted a surface scrape of the soil along the access road located on the east side of the site.
    • A water truck was used for dust suppression during demolition, removal, and recycling activities.
  • The START contractor performed visual inspections of the soil scraped areas located at the southern end of the site and along the west side of the north building.  Areas where asbestos-containing materials remained visible were identified to the ERRS contractor for additional scraping.
  • The START contractor collected a composite soil sample from the grid area located between the west side of the north building and the silt fence.  The soil was shipped to the laboratory and analyzed for asbestos.
  • The START contractor conducted area perimeter air sampling at one onsite location and at three residential locations during removal activities.  
  • Nine loads of metal have been sent off site for recycling this week. A total of 29 loads of metal have been recycled through 8/22/15.  
  •  Thirty, 20 cubic yard roll offs of asbestos-contaminated debris were transported from the site to a State of Tennessee approved asbestos landfill for disposal during this time period.  To date, a total of 111, 20 cubic yard roll offs for an estimated 2,220 cubic yards of asbestos-contaminated waste have been transported to the landfill for disposal.
 

August 24 to August 28, 2015

     The ERRS contractor conducted removal activities to include the following:

    •  Completed loading and recycling of structural steel from the south building.
                    o   Removed asbestos-contaminated debris from the footprint of the south building. 

                    o   Scraped asbestos-contaminated soil from areas south and west of the south building

                    o   Scraped and washed the residual asbestos-contaminated material from all building areas

                    o   Conducted a surface scrape of the soil along the north side of the access road 

The START contractor performed visual inspections of the soil scraped areas located at the northern, southern, and western ends of the site.  Areas where asbestos-containing materials remained visible were identified to the ERRS contractor for additional scraping.  The START contractor collected  composite soil samples from the grid areas located on the north, south, east, and west sides of the site.  The soil was shipped to the laboratory and analyzed for asbestos.  Soil sampling results from 8/20/15, 8/24/15, and 8/25/15 comprising eight grid locations ranged from 0.5% to 5.25% chrysotile asbestos.·   The START contractor conducted area perimeter air sampling at one onsite location and at three residential locations during removal activities.      Two loads of metal were sent off site for recycling this week. A final total of 31 loads of metal have been recycled through 8/24/15.·         Thirty-one 20 cubic yard roll offs of asbestos-contaminated debris were transported from the site to a State of Tennessee approved asbestos landfill for disposal during this time period.  To date, a total of 142, 20 cubic yard roll offs for an estimated 2,840 cubic yards of asbestos-contaminated waste have been transported to the landfill for disposal.

 August 31 to September 4, 2015

      The ERRS contractor conducted removal and backfilling activities to include the following:
                    o   Completed removal of asbestos-contaminated debris from on and around the north end of the footprint of the south building.  The debris was loaded and transported for disposal.

                    o   Completed washing the residual asbestos-contaminated debris from the footprint of the south building and the alley way between the north and south buildings.

                    o   Completed backfilling and capping of all soil-scraped areas on site.

                    o   Decontaminated and demobilized site equipment.·  


       The START contractor performed visual inspections of the building footprints.  No visible asbestos-containing materials was observed.   The START contractor collected a total of 17 composite soil samples from 7/21/15 to 8/26/15 that ranged from 0.5% to 5.25% chrysotile asbestos and 0.25% amosite asbestos    The START contractor collected at total of 114 area perimeter air samples during the removal.  No asbestos was detected in any air samples.  One 20 cubic yard roll off of asbestos-contaminated debris was transported from the site to a State of Tennessee approved asbestos landfill for disposal during this time period.  For the removal, a final total of 143, 20 cubic yard roll offs, for an estimated 2,860 cubic yards of asbestos-contaminated waste, have been transported to the landfill for disposal.·         The ERRS and START contractors demobilized from the site. 
   
2.1.3 Enforcement Activities, Identity of Potentially Responsible Parties (PRPs)

This is a fund lead time critical removal action.

2.1.4 Progress Metrics

  •  

    Waste Stream Medium Quantity Manifest # Treatment Disposal
     asbestos containing material  roof tile, debris, and soil  143 rolloffs
    (20 cubic yards/rolloff)
     see waste tracking
    spreadsheet in Documents
    section of website
     landfill  Waste Management-West Camden Sanitary landfill, Camden, TN
               
               

                .             

   

  2.2 Planning Section
    2.2.1 Anticipated Activities

There are no further removal activities anticipated for the Site.

2.2.1.1 Planned Response Activities

2.2.1.2 Next Steps

The removal information, including data and site figures, has been provided to the EPA Superfund Remedial Program.

2.2.2 Issues

  2.3 Logistics Section
    No information available at this time.

  2.4 Finance Section
    2.4.1 Narrative

Actual project costs fell under the budgeted ceilings. 

   
Estimated Costs *
  Budgeted Total To Date Remaining % Remaining
Extramural Costs
ERRS - Cleanup Contractor $450,000.00 $432,817.00 $17,183.00 3.82%
TAT/START $150,000.00 $54,000.00 $96,000.00 64.00%
Intramural Costs
 
Total Site Costs $600,000.00 $486,817.00 $113,183.00 18.86%

* The above accounting of expenditures is an estimate based on figures known to the OSC at the time this report was written. The OSC does not necessarily receive specific figures on final payments made to any contractor(s). Other financial data which the OSC must rely upon may not be entirely up-to-date. The cost accounting provided in this report does not necessarily represent an exact monetary figure which the government may include in any claim for cost recovery.


  2.5 Other Command Staff
    No information available at this time.

3. Participating Entities
  No information available at this time.

4. Personnel On Site
  No information available at this time.

5. Definition of Terms
  No information available at this time.

6. Additional sources of information
  No information available at this time.

7. Situational Reference Materials
  No information available at this time.

POLREP #4 Last Updated 5/23/2016