U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

HTTPS

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock () or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Orofino Asbestos Site

All POL/SITREP's for this site Orofino Asbestos Site
Orofino, Clearwater County, ID - EPA Region X
POLREP #7
Printer Friendly  |   PDF
 
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
POLLUTION/SITUATION REPORT
Orofino Asbestos Site - Removal Polrep

EPA Emergency Response

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region X

Subject: POLREP #7
Orofino Asbestos Site
IDN001002885
Orofino, Clearwater County, ID
Latitude: 46.4793470 Longitude: -116.2551395


To: James Werntz, EPA Region 10 (POLREP List)
Calvin Terada, EPA Region 10 (POLREP List)
Wally Moon, EPA Region 10 (POLREP List)

From: Angie Zavala, On-Scene Coordinator
Date: 4/28/2015
Reporting Period: April 24,2015 through April 28, 2015

1. Introduction
  1.1 Background
   
Site Number: IDN001002885    Contract Number:  
D.O. Number:      Action Memo Date: 4/7/2015
Response Authority: CERCLA    Response Type: Emergency
Response Lead: EPA    Incident Category: Removal Action
NPL Status: Non NPL    Operable Unit:
Mobilization Date: 4/20/2015    Start Date: 4/21/2015
Demob Date:      Completion Date:  
CERCLIS ID: IDN001002885    RCRIS ID:
ERNS No.:    State Notification: 09/30/2010
FPN#:    Reimbursable Account #:


1.1.1 Incident Category
Fund Lead Removal Action. 

1.1.2 Site Description
In 2011, EPA removed asbestos-contaminated soil from several properties in and around Orofino and combined that soil with the existing asbestos-contaminated soil at the First Baptist Church (FBC), creating a repository.  The asbestos-contaminated soil repository is behind a gravity-based retaining wall. The retaining wall is located along the north and west boundaries of the FBC's parking area.  The repository consists of two areas, including an asphalt parking area and a vegetated dry retention area. Work on the retaining wall and repository was completed by EPA in 2012. 

In 2014, representatives from the FBC notified EPA about several issues related to the integrity of the repository cap. Specifically, areas of the asphalt parking area were settling, and vegetation had not been well established in the dry retention basin.
 
1.1.2.1 Location
The repository site is located at the FBC, Orofino, Clearwater County, Idaho.

1.1.2.2 Description of Threat

The elevated concentrations of chrysotile asbestos found at the repository indicate that the potential for inhalation exposures exists.  Because of the lack of vegetation and other surface water drainage issues associated with the dry retention basin, wind and surface water and mechanical erosion could eventually expose and damage the protective polyvinyl chloride (PVC) liner, which could expose the underlying asbestos-contaminated material and soil.  At the parking area, sections of the asphalt are settling and allowing surface water and sediment to accumulate.  The conditions of both areas of the repository increase the potential for the asbestos-contaminated soil to be released.

Exposure to airborne friable asbestos may result in potential health risks because persons breathing the air may breathe in asbestos fibers. Continued exposure can increase the amount of fibers that remain in the lungs. Fibers embedded in lung tissue over time may cause serious lung diseases, including asbestosis, lung cancer, or mesothelioma.

1.1.3 Preliminary Removal Assessment/Removal Site Inspection Results

Refer to Polreps #1,  #2 and #3 for initial site inspection results that led to the removal actions before 2014.

 

Following the notification of these issues by the FBC to EPA, EPA's Superfund Technical Assessment and Response Team (START) contractor investigated the site in March 2014 and collected samples of the dry retention basin topsoil for soils testing. In August 2014, EPA returned to the site with its Emergency and Rapid Response Services (ERRS) and START contractors and met with representatives of the FBC to further assess these issues. Based on these March and August 2014 site inspections, EPA identified the following problems:
 

·        The settled areas of the asphalt allowed water and sediment to puddle near the engineered retaining wall;

·        Surface water did not drain properly from the asphalt parking lot through the dry retention basin and into the dry well;

·        Following hydroseeding in October 2012, a grass cover had never been established, and the dry retention basin was only sparsely vegetated;

·        The steep slopes at the northeastern of the retaining wall did not provide convenient access to the lower sections of the wall for maintenance and repair activities.

       .      The steep slopes along the asphalt at the southwest of the retaining wall were not graded,
             and represented a liability issue since people or vehicles could drive off the edge or get hurt. In addition, soil was eroding along the steep edge and out from under the asphalt, and, if not addressed could expose asbestos-contaminated soil.


2. Current Activities
  2.1 Operations Section
   
2.1.1 Narrative

ERRS and START contractors and EPA OSC mobilized to the site on Monday April 20, 2015.  START drove the EPA Region 10 communications rig to be used as the site's command post.  Equipment was also delivered on Monday to the site and set to promptly start the planned repairs (described below) on the repository on Tuesday morning.   

·        Repair the settled areas of the asphalt to allow for proper surface water drainage and to prevent surface water from ponding on the asphalt near the engineered retaining wall;

·        Establish vegetation in the dry retention basin by adding additional top soil and adding a new seed mix optimized for local climate conditions;

·        Reconstruct the surface details of the corrugated metal pipe around the dry well to allow for better drainage of surface water in the dry retention basin;

·        Add a gravel apron at the eastern edge of the dry retention basin to allow for better drainage of surface water from the asphalt parking area;

·        Construct ramps at the northeastern and southwestern edges of the retaining wall to allow for better access to the lower sections of the wall for inspections and maintenance.


2.1.2 Response Actions to Date

See POLREP #6 for activities conducted April 20 through April 23, 2015.  This POLREP covers the operational period from April 24,2015 through April 28, 2015.

Friday, April 24

1.      Excavation of the asphalt repair was completed (depth of 3 feet bgs), and the final two trucks/pups were loaded with the waste material (asphalt and contaminated soil) from the eastern extent of the excavation, and excavated material was transported to the landfill.

2.      ERRS performed sweeping of the parking lot after the final haul truck removed the last of the contaminated soil.

3.      ERRS subcontractor arrived on site to perform in-situ compaction testing of the first lift in the western half of the asphalt repair area. Initial tests indicated low compaction and ideal moisture content. ERRS applied water and recompacted the first lift to maximum achievable compaction (95% to 98%), prior to placement of the second lift. ERRS performed blending of the subbase material stockpiles to evenly distribute fines and gravel particles throughout the stockpile.  ERRS completed two lifts by the end of the day, and compacted all day long.

4.      Final delivery trucks import the last gravel fill material, for a total of 13 loads.

5.      ERRS continued to excavate for the gravel apron trench.

6.      START performed dust monitoring with the DataRAMs, and the results were all less than the site action limit. START collected three air samples from the work zone, including two perimeter and one personal, which will be submitted to an off-site laboratory for PCM testing. 

Saturday, April 25

1.      ERRS completed two lifts over the course of the day, compacting each lift for a minimum of 4 hours.

2.      ERRS used sweeper to clean parking lot.

3.      START performed dust monitoring with the DataRAMs, and the results were all less than the site action limit. No  air sampling was conducted as no all contaminated material was either removed from the site or under an aggregate cap and contained, and no further air samples are to be collected.

4.      ERRS used sweeper equipment to clean the parking lot.

5.      ERRS continued to work on gravel apron. Geotextile placed along the base at the bottom of the washed rock apron. Washed drain rock was placed in the trench and along the length of the interface of the asphalt and dry retention basin.

6.      Evidence of cars hitting the top of the retaining wall was observed, and parking space stoppers will be installed. 

 

Monday, April 27

1.      ERRS subcontractor arrived on site to perform in-situ compaction testing of the two lifts placed on April 25. Test results indicated that compaction rate was achieved (98%), with only a few areas not at design compaction. ERRS applied water and recompacted to achieve design compaction levels or higher. ERRS completed the final two lifts by the end of the day, and compacted all day long.  The compaction contractor tested the final lift and confirmed that final design compaction was achieved throughout the repair (98% to 100% compaction).

2.      START performed dust monitoring with the DataRAMs, and the results were all less than the site action limit. No air sampling was conducted.

3.      ERRS used sweeper equipment to clean the parking lot.

4.      ERRS continued to work on the gravel apron.

5.      Construction started on the lower access ramp. One small (<6-inch diameter) tree was removed that was in the path of the ramp.

 

Tuesday, April 28

1.      ERRS surveyed the asphalt repair area and added aggregate to bring to final grade and prepare for asphalt.

2.      START performed dust monitoring with the DataRAMs, and the results were all less than the site action limit. No air sampling was conducted.

3.      ERRS continued to work on the lower access ramp.
4. Nez Perce Groundwater Project Manager conducted a site visit with EPA.

 

 2.1.3 Enforcement Activities, Identity of Potentially Responsible Parties (PRPs)

Addressed in Confidential Enforcement Addendum to Action Memorandum.

2.1.4 Progress Metrics

Waste Stream Medium Quantity Manifest # Treatment Disposal
Asbestos Contaminated  Soil and Asphalt  Soil 330 cubic yards     Finley Buttes Landfill, Boardman, Oregon


  2.2 Planning Section
   
2.2.1 Anticipated Activities

2.2.1.1 Planned Response Activities

The following activities are planned for the next reporting period:
-- Finish construction of the lower ramp, and place aggregate along ramp surface;
-- Finish the compaction of the asphalt repair area
-- Seed dry retention basin, ramps, and disturbed soil areas; and
-- Pave asphalt repair area and install concrete parking space stoppers.

2.2.2  Outstanding Issues
None

  2.3 Logistics Section
    No information available at this time.

  2.4 Finance Section
    No information available at this time.

  2.5 Other Command Staff
    No information available at this time.

3. Participating Entities
  No information available at this time.

4. Personnel On Site
  ERRS-5
START-2
EPA-1

5. Definition of Terms
  No information available at this time.

6. Additional sources of information
  No information available at this time.

7. Situational Reference Materials
  No information available at this time.